245/35/20 front 0 camber.
285/30/20 rear 1 1/6 camber car tracks perfectly straight getting on it or just cornering or tracking, no mods to fender wheels. Was on lowering springs. Now I'm on coilovers, ground to top of fender wheels 26 inches all the way around I might go down another half inch in the front, no rubbing 32 offset front 45 rear
So do you think you would have rubbing without the camber of 1 1/6 in certain driving situations? Such as in a sharp curve at good speed and hitting a dip or pothole?
So do you think you would have rubbing without the camber of 1 1/6 in certain driving situations? Such as in a sharp curve at good speed and hitting a dip or pothole?
Even my setup did that, once, and after one time I take that curve less speedy. I have the OEM 255 tire in the rear on a 9.5" wide 19" wheel with +39, and a dip in the middle of the turn made the RR, outside, tire smack into the wheel well. So, your question is always going to be answered "yes", it just takes the right conditions to force the tire into the fender.
So do you think you would have rubbing without the camber of 1 1/6 in certain driving situations? Such as in a sharp curve at good speed and hitting a dip or pothole?
20x9 +33 and 20x10.5 +40 lowered on Eibachs for a few more weeks until BC Racing coilovers show up. Yes, the wheels are two different designs. But the car doesn't know any different. Same offset, same weight, you just don't see both sides of the car at the same time so why not...
I’m looking at some rear wheels 20x11 ET56. The extra 4mm would bring them inside the fender more but do you think these would hit anything on the inside (suspension)? Tires on them now are 315/35/20
20x9 +33 and 20x10.5 +40 lowered on Eibachs for a few more weeks until BC Racing coilovers show up. Yes, the wheels are two different designs. But the car doesn't know any different. Same offset, same weight, you just don't see both sides of the car at the same time so why not...View attachment 85196View attachment 85195
I'm looking to swap my wheels with AB-52 from ARK. Anyone know what offset and width to pick? I was thinking 19x9+30 front and 19x10+45 rear. They also have other sizes in the picture.
Yes, that would work just fine. The whole point of doing a square setup is so you can rotate the wheels front to back, so you need the same offset front and rear.
That is exactly what I run on the front. Obviously it would work in the back, but a spacer might make it more pleasing to the eye to more closely match the front almost flush look. My rear offset is 39 on a 9.5" rim. I run OEM staggered tire sizes.
That is exactly what I run on the front. Obviously it would work in the back, but a spacer might make it more pleasing to the eye to more closely match the front almost flush look. My rear offset is 39 on a 9.5" rim. I run OEM staggered tire sizes.
That is exactly what I run on the front. Obviously it would work in the back, but a spacer might make it more pleasing to the eye to more closely match the front almost flush look. My rear offset is 39 on a 9.5" rim. I run OEM staggered tire sizes.
Too much Ima thinking, from what I've read on here. 8.5 in front is the widest. I've read of that quite a few times. Even a 9" I have not encountered on here that I recall. Now, watch, somebody will chime in and say "I run 9s in front, offset 22, 265 tire and it's just fine".
Too much Ima thinking, from what I've read on here. 8.5 in front is the widest. I've read of that quite a few times. Even a 9" I have not encountered on here that I recall. Now, watch, somebody will chime in and say "I run 9s in front, offset 22, 265 tire and it's just fine".
Yeah, shouldn't be an issue at all in the rear. It actually is 26mm further away from anything on the inside compar d to the 10.5 inch wheel. And 12mm less poke than the 10.5 so no problem.