I was told before by John to wait for the Stage 2 but I guess he never got the bugs all out as of yet , perhaps that stage 2 is now scraped(
If you go back to the stock race chip race mode you may be fine.
I just got an a bit more aggressive map for Sport mode this will keep it safe and later get a normal Race mode Map back on .. Sport mode works great but with way less power ,, and I think the Tork Stage 1 would be faster than what I have trouble free as well , thinking as well to go down from 19 to 18 rim with 235 up front and 265 rear Michelins with a 10 to 13 lb rim weight reduction which should bring me out of corners a bit quicker on Track days ,just running on a Novice level only !!! When you went from the RC to Stage 1 were your exhaust running with only the Primary Cat s still on like I have now ??? Thanks Tim
Actually the opposite. Dynocom dynos typically run 10-15% higher than dynojets. While most Mustang dynos run 10-12% lower than dynojets.
I had just a catback and drop in k&ns when i switched from RC to tork stage 1. RC ran 11.7s, 1st day with tork tune low 11.7s then next outing 11.44 same mods.I just got an a bit more aggressive map for Sport mode this will keep it safe and later get a normal Race mode Map back on .. Sport mode works great but with way less power ,, and I think the Tork Stage 1 would be faster than what I have trouble free as well , thinking as well to go down from 19 to 18 rim with 235 up front and 265 rear Michelins with a 10 to 13 lb rim weight reduction which should bring me out of corners a bit quicker on Track days ,just running on a Novice level only !!! When you went from the RC to Stage 1 were your exhaust running with only the Primary Cat s still on like I have now ??? Thanks Tim
I was told the opposite , and that the this Dyno read very close to a Mustang Dyno, what I do know that is factual , I have as much performance mods as possible and running off pump gas with boost
here are the exact mods for my 2018 Stinger GT ,1 : RC performance chip , CAI , FMIC , NGK 2 degree lower Race plug s Molly 5 w 40 and 2 catch cans exhaust JUn BL cat less down pipes with Borla type s cat back exhaust !!! What makes it hard to is my torque is over 500 ftlbs and whp only 350 hp , best dragy 0 to 60 time was only 4.52 seconds so it appears I have the slowest modded Stinger GT , OH well 
Yeah thinking this as well lol
Shoot that is very respectful time with just a few mods is yours Awd as well Tim ?
I might need to put back 2 cats back on again and all my runs were at 1/2 to 3/4 s of fuel , so pretty much around 4100 lbs
Nothing personal brother but the RC is your problem as they make a lot less power than the other piggybacks/tunes. With your mods you should be making around 430-450whp(dynojet) or ~400whp(Mustang) and at least running low 12s with 4sec 0-60s.I was told the opposite , and that the this Dyno read very close to a Mustang Dyno, what I do know that is factual , I have as much performance mods as possible and running off pump gas with boost
using 94 to 98 octane values , and I have no WMI or NOS added and the best 1/4 mile off Dragy was only 12.7 ! These cars come with 365 hp / 376 ftlbs stock on the crank and my last DynoCom run I still only got 356.5 AWD Hp and 502 ftlbs torque , so that being said , then I have the worst Stinger GT out there , numbers don’t lie , just want my DD on the occasional Track day ( circuit) track
It would be great if TOrk would run 1.5 tune running 19 psi for us DD s who just do the occasional Circuit Track day lol be nice to run at 385 whp and 475 to 500 ftlbs torque he he on pump gas
️ 93 to 97 octane
Gee that would be perfect for the occasional Track day this summer, I would personally like a ECU above all but this might be a opposition having the secondary cats now off lolNothing personal brother but the RC is your problem as they make a lot less power than the other piggybacks/tunes. With your mods you should be making around 430-450whp(dynojet) or ~400whp(Mustang) and at least running low 12s with 4sec 0-60s.
Also, here’s one example of dynocom’s running about 10% higher than Mustang & dynojets. Dynocom vs Mustang Dyno vs Dynojet - MY350Z.COM - Nissan 350Z and 370Z Forum Discussion
There are many comparisons online that show about the same results and almost always show dynocom running 5-10% higher than dynojets.
Just upgrade your chip/tune like tonka and so many people have done and you’ll be much happier.
It would be great if TOrk would run 1.5 tune running 19 psi for us DD s who just do the occasional Circuit Track day lol be nice to run at 385 whp and 475 to 500 ftlbs torque he he on pump gas
Tork stage 1 would be a great mild DD and track day car. With your mods and only 18 psi prob around 430-435 hp and easily runs on 92 octane (US).THis would be great for what I need here and I would get some lighter wheels , maybe drop down to 18 rims which should lighten each wheel by 10 or more lbs which should pull quicker out of the corners then on who perhaps add a JB4 to it later if needed
My car is GT2 AWD, 4100 lb big girl.
After adding intake, and fmic i was running 11.9s dragy. Later got stage 1.5 beta tunes, light wheels and secondary dp and dropped that to 11.58 and 3.65 last March. This winter with jb4 #stacklife 11.51 and 3.58.
Used jb4 to add a little boost at high rpm and now wmi controller. No new times yet with wmi.
getting it up possibly over 400 whp which is more whp than my 350 whp at the moment, worth a shot at least then perhaps I will be able see later if anything else is needed my car , as it is like your s running around 4100 lbs stock with 19 in wheels , and with the lighter exhaust and lighter wheels it should be closer to 4k!, Thanks Tim for the heads up on this , as you have same type of car and so it help s out , Canadian gas here in British Columbia sucks , so I always run a bit of Octane boost to make sure I get at least a true 94 octane level And up here we are running around 365 meters above sea level
Just checking on line and what you have said seems to be the case indeed DynoCom showed higher Numbers than the Dyno Jet , means my Awd Stinger GT really has no power , perhaps a ECU tune is next and out with my piggy backNothing personal brother but the RC is your problem as they make a lot less power than the other piggybacks/tunes. With your mods you should be making around 430-450whp(dynojet) or ~400whp(Mustang) and at least running low 12s with 4sec 0-60s.
Also, here’s one example of dynocom’s running about 10% higher than Mustang & dynojets. Dynocom vs Mustang Dyno vs Dynojet - MY350Z.COM - Nissan 350Z and 370Z Forum Discussion
There are many comparisons online that show about the same results and almost always show dynocom running 5-10% higher than dynojets.
Just upgrade your chip/tune like tonka and so many people have done and you’ll be much happier.
Yeah unfortunately the RC is not anywhere close or comparable to the JB4 or Lap3 piggybacks. You don’t need an ECU tune to get the gains I quoted and the 450whp most people are running with your mods and those piggybacks.Just checking on line and what you have said seems to be the case indeed DynoCom showed higher Numbers than the Dyno Jet , means my Awd Stinger GT really has no power , perhaps a ECU tune is next and out with my piggy back
Mine is Awd so I would think that there is big difference in whp and ftlbs torque, but still better perhaps than what I have now
