And not sure what stats your describing but based on their own dynos a stock Stinger makes the following:
Lap3=Peak 460tq@4500 rpm
JB4=Peak 495tq@2700 rpm
Lap3=360tq@3k vs 480tq@3k=JB4, Lap3=433tq@4k vs 440tq@4k=JB4,
Lap3=425tq@5k vs 410tq@5k=JB4,
Lap3=340tq@6k vs 340tq@6k=JB4.
View attachment 15763 View attachment 15786
That’s +120tq@3k and +35tq peak advantage for the JB4, but only a +15tq@5k advantage with the lap3 and then they are dead even at 6k. I admit the lap3 makes more power, but only from 4500-5500 rpm. So the JB4 actually makes more power for 80% of the powerband, but the lap3 makes more hp for 1k rpm.
Additionally if you compare both of their top dyno results the lap3 makes 23whp more, but 26wtq less than the JB4. However the JB4 Stinger has completely stock exhaust and all 4 cats.
View attachment 15826 View attachment 15825
You know secondary DPs make 30whp/26wtq and primary DPs with catback exhaust would make even more. The JB4 Stinger with the same DPs & exhaust would conservatively make another 40-50whp/wtq and easily push 500whp/570wtq.
So from where I’m sitting they are both amazing upgrades that can do the same things but have different priorities. Documented results point to the lap3 pushing peak HP, while the JB4 maxes low end power and a longer flatter torque curve.
IMHO the JB4 has so many advantages it’s still the superior hybrid style piggyback. Unless I see proof otherwise I wouldn’t consider anything being “better than” the JB4.