The car lovers social network
Automotive components
Create videos that captivate
Automotive Hot or Not
Vehicle hacker protection
By enthusiasts, for enthusiasts
Advertise with us!
Timing is everything
Get the best deals on wheels!
Vehicle Specific Solutions
Brands you can trust
Promo code: REDLINE
Kia Hyundai Auto Racing
Authentic Tuning
The car lovers social network
Automotive components
Create videos that captivate
Automotive Hot or Not
Vehicle hacker protection
By enthusiasts, for enthusiasts
Advertise with us!
Timing is everything
Get the best deals on wheels!
Vehicle Specific Solutions
Brands you can trust
Promo code: REDLINE
Kia Hyundai Auto Racing
Authentic Tuning

I pulled that off the Mission Race Way website today. These great numbers we're seeing the boys getting are inspiring me tune-up and get out there.Not sure what the cage rules are these days. It used to be 11.99. Then they lowered to 11.49. But some cars run 10s stock and they let us run those without issue. I think at some point they lowered it to 9.99s.
Just a thought... would it be beneficial to add other information? I think Density Altitude would be very helpful. And, to a lesser extent, wheels. The more we know about the cars and conditions, the better we can understand how our modifications are working. I would also like to see weight, but I’m not sure all tracks have scales. Thoughts?Another day another brake snip record! Angel moves from #8 to #3 with a 11.764 @ 116.79.
New record 60 foot at 1.608. Slip posted in the 1/4 mile mods thread.
Here are the top 15 track times as of July 7th, 2019.
1/4 Drag strip Top 15 times (Official Track List)
1/4 mile time, speed, 1/8 mile time, speed, 60
1. 11.548 @ 122.05, @Crewdawg130, 7.49 @95.66, 1.719
GT2 RWD, Hybrid turbo, WMI, JB4, FFP intakes, Ultimate HFC primary and secondary, FMIC, Drag radials, BMS brake snip
2. 11.633 @ 120.83, @ScottyCole, 7.508 @94.00, 1.625
GT1 AWD, Lap3 Pro, K&N Intakes, Lap3 HFC, Ark Mid, Borla Catback, UP FMIC, WMI, BMS brake snip,
3. 11.764 @116.79, @Angel, 7.542@92.18, 1.608
AWD, JB4 Map 5, AP Intakes, SSR Downpipes, SSR Muffler Deletes, Tork OCC, BMS brake snip
4. 11.807 @ 117.18, @Kato_the_kia_stinger 7.60 @92.20, 1.65
AWD, JB4 map8, K&N intake, VT snorkel, WMI, 93 octane, BMS brake snip
5. 11.86 @ 117.16, @Tonkabob, 7.67 @ 93.53, 1.84
GT2 AWD, Tork ECU tune, Ark catback, JT intake, UP FMIC, SSR midpipe, E15
6. 11.94 @ 118.11, @STINGER, 7.77 @ 92.99, 1.89
RWD, JB4 map 3, WMI, VT Snorkel, K&N Drop ins, High flow CAT, JunBL mid EVC cat back
7. 11.957 @ 118.76, @GetStung 7.743 @ 91.74, 1.781
AWD, JB4 Map8, WMI, Secondary CAT bypass, Borla catback, Injen intake 93 octane + E85, E30, BMS brake snip
8. 11.959 @ 117.80 @Kinvara8017, 7.75 @ 93.28, 1.838
GT2 AWD JB4, WMI, UP FMIC, throttle body, VT snorkel, BOV, Custom primary cat back straight pipe exhaust, brake mod
9. 11.98 @118.96, @TorkMe, 7.84 @94.03, 1.95
GT RWD, Tork ECU tune, Tork intake, muffler delete, no cats, fmic. 92 Octane
10. 12.022 @ 117.42, @Stinger33 7.82 @ 92.85, 1.94
RWD, JB4 map6, JT intake, JT exhaust, Throttle body, GFB BOV
11. 12.080 @ 115.37, @twn2rbo (Brian B.), 7.80 @ 90.75, 1.754
GT AWD, JB4, Injen intakes, SSR mid, Stillen Catback, BMS brake snip
12. 12.09 @ 114.83, Miguel P, 7.80 @ 91.61, 1.86
GT2 AWD, Tork ECU Stage 1, CX CAI, CX FMIC, muffler delete.
13. 12.13 @116.78, Jesse P turbokits.com, 7.89@ 91.51, 1.87
AWD, Lap3 pro mode 2 (old mode 3), Intake, FMIC, no cats, 93 octane.
14. 12.13 @116.16, @DaBears4Lyfe, 7.89 @ 91.61, 1.87
RWD, JB4 MAP 8, CX Racing Intakes, BMS WMI, Lap 3 Primary Downpipesw/ HFC, X Force Exhaust w/ EVC Closed, GFB BOV, VT Snorkel, Sixth OCC
15. 12.17 @ 116 Michael Locke, 7.95 @ 91.93, 1.95
AWD, Lap3 pro Mode 2, Injen Intake, lap3 down, SSR Mid, 91 + E30
Short answer is we'll see. If there is demand we can make it happen on the JB4 end.
For now I'm curious to see how well this simple approach works in terms of improving launches and allowing burn outs before runs.
DA is a requirement in most other fast lists for other communities. It's 100% useless to compare a 3000ft DA to a sea-level DA.Just a thought... would it be beneficial to add other information? I think Density Altitude would be very helpful. And, to a lesser extent, wheels. The more we know about the cars and conditions, the better we can understand how our modifications are working. I would also like to see weight, but I’m not sure all tracks have scales. Thoughts?
I agree, wholeheartedly. If I run a 12 flat at Atco (nearly sea level) in ideal conditions, and someone does and 12.2 in Colorado, I want to know how their car did so well. I also agree with the spreadsheetDA is a requirement in most other fast lists for other communities. It's 100% useless to compare a 3000ft DA to a sea-level DA.
We truly need to move this list to a spreadsheet format if anybody wants to compare setups.
I did a Google sheet last year but nobody would use it as this thread kept getting updated instead. A column for each primary mod (WMI, primary DP, secondary DP, intakes, FMIC) would be enough - brands aren't important.I'm working on a spreadsheet. The trick will be how to organize it so that the mods are cleanly shown and comparable.