Sales@Tork
Stinger Enthusiast
Big turbo, my bad and sorry non John lol
And your sure it isnt running meth as well? facts man they help
Big turbo, my bad and sorry non John lol
I posted the facts with the pic.And your sure it isnt running meth as well? facts man they help
You also posted that it was a stuffed turbo then found out it was big turbo... Can you provide a link to where your getting your info? Like stated I havent seen them run any of their higher power cars o just 93 octane everything has had meth added.I posted the facts with the pic.
Yeah, 520 pump at 14 psi; 620 with meth and 21 psiNVM I found the post 520 was pump and 620 was with methanol.
And as far as using a ProTuner to control boost, that brilliant! You flash the ECU tune then switch maps for more boost depending on fuel available or intentions. Like a Bluetooth controller for boost.
Yeah, there guys are really behind!
Yeah, 520 pump at 14 psi; 620 with meth and 21 psi
And here’s a dyno from JB4 having to use much more boost and race gas and meth
Facts
I was reading on this thread someone speaking of a lack of consistency with lap3 dyno in korea vs. a 3rd party here. Well, lemme see what I can find real quick...
Terry@BMS said:They are also testing on their own dyno so until their customers are making it on 3rd party dynos, who really knows. As far as I know no lap3 customer ever matched their previous 480whp "record" dyno. That's why we always rent the independent dyno at Specialty-Z. It's widely used by many tuners around here.
Various regurgitated vitriol
What else is clear is your inconsistency with tuning: Yes, JB4 may have "logging" capabilities and "boost by gear" options; however, if you see the graph I posted of YOUR tune and any other graph of YOUR tune, they are shaky and don't look smooth whatsoever. Why would anyone want a shaky knocking tune when using regualr pump gas. Do you see Lap3 customers complaining about knock or shaky dyno graphs on pump gas? No.
![]()
How can you say that the JB4 dyno is 'shaky' when the stock line ON THE SAME GRAPH is just as 'shaky'?
English isn’t my first language? Lol it’s called autocorrect on my phone, too bad Terry. Try again. Do you know how to argue with facts or are ad hominems your only go to? Wait, sorry let me speak plainly for your mind. Have fun with your antediluvian product!
Not sure where you see the annihilation. I clearly posted dyno graphs showing that Lap3 isn't inferior. Otherwise, what is there to argue? As a user, I don't care for logging-unless I feel some inadequacy with the product I'm using, which I don't. Why would I be concerned with that since the pro tuner has had extensive R&D. Only time I ever used any logging was on the Audi platform, when I was switching out fuel pumps, running 40% ethanol, larger crank pulleys, what have you: It was necessary as tuning those types of modifications required monitoring with VCDS. I'd be scared to have to log in a simple tune...So given the total annihilation of all of your "points" in the handful of replies above, including detailed specifics, your only reply now is to make an ad hominem argument against us that we're making ad hominem arguments against you? lol
Regardless, I saw all your dynos and Lap3s, and I went with the tuner that showed me their worth. At this point, you haven't. And more people are seeing Lap3s Quality in the states.
Just curious, what 'worth' did you see that justifies a $600 higher price tag? I've never driven a Lap3 car but objectively they are slower than comparable JB4 cars.