Stinger Electronic Stability Control System - Beware!

Does it respond the same if you turn of TC?
I've not tried TC off in comfort mode. I only tried in sport mode (with TC on) and I can't reproduce the scenario.
What I realised today is that it's definitely NOT the tires. I had it happen just after putting in the LSD and before switching to the new tires. I didn't think much of it because it was raining but it was really unexpected. Same thing, I was accelerating hard on the highway from 100khp to 140kph (limit changed) in a straight line and the TC started flashing and cut power.

So, now the problem is like this:
- My open diff was changed to an LSD
- TC now steps in aggressively (only in comfort mode) when I floor it at high speeds in a straight line (around 120 to 140kph)
- Sport mode works as before, with no TC interference

Notes:
- If I accelerate a little lighter or more linear, I can take it to 200kph, no problems. TC steps in only if the pedal is floored.
- I noticed it happening right after an upshift (3 to 4). Can't be sure if it happens only on upshifts, but don't think so.

What could be the cause of this? I'm sure it's not normal because it was not happening before the diff change. I've had this car for 170k km so I know it well.

Could it be software? LSD needs new TC programming? Is this controlled by the ECU? Or the gearbox computer?

Or can it be hardware? Maybe the guys installing the new diff messed with an ABS sensor in the rear wheel? Does anyone know about any other sensors the TC is considering?
 
Hi! I'm reviving this old thread with a few questions.
Has anyone encountered their traction control cutting power and flashing while you're trying to accelerate hard at high speed and in a straight line?

I just changed my open diff to an LSD (Limited Slip Differential) (I have the 2.0 gt-line) and at the same time bought new winter tires (continental TS860S - 19" staggered).
Today, I could easily make the traction control flash and cut the power by flooring it at high speed. Temps were around 3-4 degrees Celsius and surface was slightly damp. It happens only in comfort mode. In sport, no matter what I do, there is no TC intervention.

Could there be different TC coding depending if the car has an LSD (Limited Slip Differential) or an open diff? But what would explain the TC being more sensitive with the LSD (Limited Slip Differential). The car actually feels like it puts the power down way better before the TC ruins everything.
what are the exact sizes you got on your new winter tires? do they match factory exactly? or possibly did the tire shop put the wrong size on one of the axles causing a larger than normal difference causing it to be in the threshold where the car thinks the rear tire is going too fast for the front (eg, the front tires are too large in diameter vs the rear)
 
@vipeboy2000 Tires match factory spec. 225/40R19 front and 255/35R19 rear. They are installed the correct way and pressure is exactly as required.
I also had the alignment done when installing the new tires.
 
______________________________
I've not tried TC off in comfort mode. I only tried in sport mode (with TC on) and I can't reproduce the scenario.
What I realised today is that it's definitely NOT the tires. I had it happen just after putting in the LSD (Limited Slip Differential) and before switching to the new tires. I didn't think much of it because it was raining but it was really unexpected. Same thing, I was accelerating hard on the highway from 100khp to 140kph (limit changed) in a straight line and the TC started flashing and cut power.

So, now the problem is like this:
- My open diff was changed to an LSD (Limited Slip Differential)
- TC now steps in aggressively (only in comfort mode) when I floor it at high speeds in a straight line (around 120 to 140kph)
- Sport mode works as before, with no TC interference

Notes:
- If I accelerate a little lighter or more linear, I can take it to 200kph, no problems. TC steps in only if the pedal is floored.
- I noticed it happening right after an upshift (3 to 4). Can't be sure if it happens only on upshifts, but don't think so.

What could be the cause of this? I'm sure it's not normal because it was not happening before the diff change. I've had this car for 170k km so I know it well.

Could it be software? LSD (Limited Slip Differential) needs new TC programming? Is this controlled by the ECU? Or the gearbox computer?

Or can it be hardware? Maybe the guys installing the new diff messed with an ABS sensor in the rear wheel? Does anyone know about any other sensors the TC is considering?

Before anyone flames me, No, I don't have access to, or intimate knowledge of, how the precise algorithm Kia uses works.... what I do have is more than 25 years of working on, repairing, modifying, and designing cars, trucks and SUV's, along with a deep understanding of software programming (my 9-5 career) based on available technology and how that technology should, in most cases, logically be programed to work together. Algorithms like these are INCREDIBLY complex and take years (or a large team of engineers) to develop.

I've read through this entire post, and unless I missed something, no where has anyone mentioned this simple fact:

TC (Traction Control) and ESC (Electronic Stability Control) are 2 inherently different features that function differently for different situations, but often function in lock-step with each other, based on the condition that the car "thinks" is happening. (The LSD is a 3rd factor that could come into play; I'll come back to this later...)

Generally, this is determined by data coming from a combination of all 4 wheel speed sensors, the transmission speed sensor, the vehicle speed sensor, and yes, the ECM itself (ECU, PCM, whatever acronym you want to use here, its "the computer" for the car, and/or any of the many other computers the cars has; BCM, TCM, ABS, Air bag module, ect), because it/they contain an Accelerometer and a Gyroscope, just like your smart phone does.

Accelerometers measure linear acceleration (specified in mV/g) along one or several axis and a Gyroscope measures angular velocity (specified in mV/deg/s). Accelerometers and a Gyroscopes have been used for a long time in automobiles for TC and ESC as well as detecting car crashes and for triggering airbags at just the right moment. They have many applications in mobile devices like switching between portrait and landscape modes, tap gestures to change to the next song, tapping through clothing when the device is in a pocket, or anti-blur capturing and optical image stabilization.

TC is for just want it says, TRACTION. Primarily, straight line traction (Accelerometers measure linear acceleration (specified in mV/g) along one or several axis). Starting in the early early 2000's in the USA, most manufactures leveraged the ABS system to engage the brakes to control individual wheel spin, and as the years went by, they shifted to cutting fuel, then with drive-by-wire throttle bodies, moved to an electronic takeover of the throttle body to limit engine power, and hence, wheel spin for when all drive wheels loose traction (here there would be different rules for RWD, FWD or AWD applications). TC is pretty black/white as far as the rules on how how/when it activates: "Are the wheel(s) spinning faster than the car, and/or other wheels, is/are traveling = YES or NO". As a result, either cut power to the engine or use the ABS system to pump the brakes at whatever tire is spinning faster, to slow it down and gain traction.

ESC is for other situations when the car is determined to potentially be "out of control". What is "out of control" is a grey area, and therefore is a matter of opinion and perspective, so the rules are not as simple as they are for TC. The Gyroscope measures angular velocity (specified in mV/deg/s) and combines that data with vehicle speed, acceleration, braking, and asks questions like: is the driver on the gas?, or the brake?, or neither?, How much G forces are being applied? on what axis? multiple axis? are any wheels spinning?, which ones? or are they all spinning? and a whole host of other questions that are answered by the data. The software takes those questions (the rules) and answers (the data) and determines that: if "THIS" is happening, then do "THAT". This is all based on what's programmed into the data table. When you break it all down, its quite incredible that It does all this..... in microseconds.

Keep in mind that the car is "Reactive", not "Proactive". It can only react to things that have already happened. It does this INCREDIBLY fast, but its still a "Reaction" to a known event. However, new technology is breaching the gap between "Reactive" and "Proactive" with the introduction of things like: front end radar and camera systems (think lane assist, adaptive cruise, automatic braking, ect), and to some degree impact warning sensors. Now the car actually can "SEE" to some degree and make "Proactive" decisions for the driver. This added input can change how ESC behaves.

@7Andrei7 The Stinger has a "mechanical" LSD; its not controlled by the computer. She's old school, which I'm glad about, because as a driving enthusiasts with a "spirited/aggressive" driving style, a mechanical LSD is WAYYYY more predictable than the electronic versions, IMO. HOWEVER, if the car comes with an LSD from the factory or not, its very likely they have different software packages in them to determine how TC and ESC should act in specific situations because, by the nature of its existence, the inputs received by the ECM will be different when an LDS is present and is mechanically reacting, and therefore changing the inputs going to the ECM in real time. If I am right, its likely that since you altered your car with the addition of the mechanical LSD, and the software is the package for the Non-LSD version, it may never act exactly like a factory equipped LSD car.

We aren't driving Tesla's :lipsaresealed: here; and unlike Tesla's, to my knowledge, there isn't an option offered by Kia to replace, add or subtract specific pieces of software on individual vehicles. I have asked several dealers about this already, because my GTS does not come with a lot of the software features the GT2's have, and I have inquired about adding them; I've been told that not possible. The reason I reference Tesla here is because that IS something they offer; you can "A' La Carte" purchase individual software features (for a $$$ of course) and download them into your car. I'm not telling you not to ask; go do your own research and try to find out. If you do, please let me know......

Someone mentioned in an earlier post in this thread that we are raising a generation of unskilled drivers that rely on technology like TC and ESC..... well, you can thank the politicians who vote on the laws in the USA; they are the ones who voted to mandate safety features like ABS, air bags, seat belts, and yes, TC, ESC, back up cameras, ect. in this country. The manufactures are "Forced" to have these things as standard features to sell their cars in the USA.

"The NHTSA required all new passenger vehicles sold in the US to be equipped with ESC as of the 2012 model year, and estimated it will prevent 5,300–9,600 annual fatalities."

In summary, I dont think its realistic that we as the driver of the car, can realistically say "the car should have done this or the car should have done that" in any situation. There are simply too many variables related to how the car is equipped, combined with what driving mode the car is set at, and with what the driver is doing, what the sensors are telling the ECM, and how the software is trying to react; it's all happening too quickly in real time.

IMO, the TC and ESC systems I had on my K5 and now on my K8, are pretty damn good. The K5's system saved my A$$ a couple times. As for the K8, I've gotten it sideways in both Comfort and Sport; I took my foot off the pedals and just steered it toward safety and it did what it need to do to keep me out of the ditch. I think its "just right" on the edge of fun and safety. If you don't want the nanny's, turn them off and its all up to you.

At the end of the day, you cant re-write the laws of physics on our planet (out in the universe is another matter). TC, ESC, Air bags, adaptive cruise, self-drive, self-park, ect; All these features can't solve every problem and objects in motion tend to stay in motion, until they encounter an equal or greater force to counter-balance them (or you hit a ditch, guardrail or another car).

All of this is just my $0.02
 
Last edited:
@Monarch_GTS thank you for the very detailed explanation!
In the meantime I did make a visit to the dealer and they confirmed that the ECM (HECU) and ABS sensors are the same for both LSD and open diff Stinger. At least mechanically. They don't know about the software in the ECM but they will look at it.

The thing is that I might have managed to fix it in the meantime.
I took out both rear wheel speed (ABS) sensors and cleaned them. There was a bit of dirt on both of them. I stuck them back in and went on a newly opened section of ring road, which has almost no traffic, and did some tests.

I did a few hard pulls from 100 to 170kph and it was as if the car was relearning how to deploy TC.
On the first 2 pulls it cut power aggressively and the light flashed in the dash.
The next 2 pulls it started to flash but there was no obvious cut in power. The revs were still going up while the TC was flashing.
And finally, for the last 3 pulls there was no reaction at all from the TC.
The surface was damp and about 6 degrees celsius. I always kept the gas pedal fully depressed, beyond the kick down button.

I still need to do some "real world" tests but I really hope this is it and I don't need to go back to the dealer.
 
From interior to exterior to high performance - everything you need for your Stinger awaits you...
Before anyone flames me, No, I don't have access to, or intimate knowledge of, how the precise algorithm Kia uses works.... what I do have is more than 25 years of working on, repairing, modifying, and designing cars, trucks and SUV's, along with a deep understanding of software programming (my 9-5 career) based on available technology and how that technology should, in most cases, logically be programed to work together. Algorithms like these are INCREDIBLY complex and take years (or a large team of engineers) to develop.

I've read through this entire post, and unless I missed something, no where has anyone mentioned this simple fact:

TC (Traction Control) and ESC (Electronic Stability Control) are 2 inherently different features that function differently for different situations, but often function in lock-step with each other, based on the condition that the car "thinks" is happening. (The LSD (Limited Slip Differential) is a 3rd factor that could come into play; I'll come back to this later...)

Generally, this is determined by data coming from a combination of all 4 wheel speed sensors, the transmission speed sensor, the vehicle speed sensor, and yes, the ECM itself (ECU, PCM, whatever acronym you want to use here, its "the computer" for the car, and/or any of the many other computers the cars has; BCM, TCM, ABS, Air bag module, ect), because it/they contain an Accelerometer and a Gyroscope, just like your smart phone does.

Accelerometers measure linear acceleration (specified in mV/g) along one or several axis and a Gyroscope measures angular velocity (specified in mV/deg/s). Accelerometers and a Gyroscopes have been used for a long time in automobiles for TC and ESC as well as detecting car crashes and for triggering airbags at just the right moment. They have many applications in mobile devices like switching between portrait and landscape modes, tap gestures to change to the next song, tapping through clothing when the device is in a pocket, or anti-blur capturing and optical image stabilization.

TC is for just want it says, TRACTION. Primarily, straight line traction (Accelerometers measure linear acceleration (specified in mV/g) along one or several axis). Starting in the early early 2000's in the USA, most manufactures leveraged the ABS system to engage the brakes to control individual wheel spin, and as the years went by, they shifted to cutting fuel, then with drive-by-wire throttle bodies, moved to an electronic takeover of the throttle body to limit engine power, and hence, wheel spin for when all drive wheels loose traction (here there would be different rules for RWD, FWD or AWD applications). TC is pretty black/white as far as the rules on how how/when it activates: "Are the wheel(s) spinning faster than the car, and/or other wheels, is/are traveling = YES or NO". As a result, either cut power to the engine or use the ABS system to pump the brakes at whatever tire is spinning faster, to slow it down and gain traction.

ESC is for other situations when the car is determined to potentially be "out of control". What is "out of control" is a grey area, and therefore is a matter of opinion and perspective, so the rules are not as simple as they are for TC. The Gyroscope measures angular velocity (specified in mV/deg/s) and combines that data with vehicle speed, acceleration, braking, and asks questions like: is the driver on the gas?, or the brake?, or neither?, How much G forces are being applied? on what axis? multiple axis? are any wheels spinning?, which ones? or are they all spinning? and a whole host of other questions that are answered by the data. The software takes those questions (the rules) and answers (the data) and determines that: if "THIS" is happening, then do "THAT". This is all based on what's programmed into the data table. When you break it all down, its quite incredible that It does all this..... in microseconds.

Keep in mind that the car is "Reactive", not "Proactive". It can only react to things that have already happened. It does this INCREDIBLY fast, but its still a "Reaction" to a known event. However, new technology is breaching the gap between "Reactive" and "Proactive" with the introduction of things like: front end radar and camera systems (think lane assist, adaptive cruise, automatic braking, ect), and to some degree impact warning sensors. Now the car actually can "SEE" to some degree and make "Proactive" decisions for the driver. This added input can change how ESC behaves.

@7Andrei7 The Stinger has a "mechanical" LSD (Limited Slip Differential); its not controlled by the computer. She's old school, which I'm glad about, because as a driving enthusiasts with a "spirited/aggressive" driving style, a mechanical LSD (Limited Slip Differential) is WAYYYY more predictable than the electronic versions, IMO. HOWEVER, if the car comes with an LSD (Limited Slip Differential) from the factory or not, its very likely they have different software packages in them to determine how TC and ESC should act in specific situations because, by the nature of its existence, the inputs received by the ECM will be different when an LDS is present and is mechanically reacting, and therefore changing the inputs going to the ECM in real time. If I am right, its likely that since you altered your car with the addition of the mechanical LSD (Limited Slip Differential), and the software is the package for the Non-LSD (Limited Slip Differential) version, it may never act exactly like a factory equipped LSD (Limited Slip Differential) car.

We aren't driving Tesla's :lipsaresealed: here; and unlike Tesla's, to my knowledge, there isn't an option offered by Kia to replace, add or subtract specific pieces of software on individual vehicles. I have asked several dealers about this already, because my GTS does not come with a lot of the software features the GT2's have, and I have inquired about adding them; I've been told that not possible. The reason I reference Tesla here is because that IS something they offer; you can "A' La Carte" purchase individual software features (for a $$$ of course) and download them into your car. I'm not telling you not to ask; go do your own research and try to find out. If you do, please let me know......

Someone mentioned in an earlier post in this thread that we are raising a generation of unskilled drivers that rely on technology like TC and ESC..... well, you can thank the politicians who vote on the laws in the USA; they are the ones who voted to mandate safety features like ABS, air bags, seat belts, and yes, TC, ESC, back up cameras, ect. in this country. The manufactures are "Forced" to have these things as standard features to sell their cars in the USA.

"The NHTSA required all new passenger vehicles sold in the US to be equipped with ESC as of the 2012 model year, and estimated it will prevent 5,300–9,600 annual fatalities."

In summary, I dont think its realistic that we as the driver of the car, can realistically say "the car should have done this or the car should have done that" in any situation. There are simply too many variables related to how the car is equipped, combined with what driving mode the car is set at, and with what the driver is doing, what the sensors are telling the ECM, and how the software is trying to react; it's all happening too quickly in real time.

IMO, the TC and ESC systems I had on my K5 and now on my K8, are pretty damn good. The K5's system saved my A$$ a couple times. As for the K8, I've gotten it sideways in both Comfort and Sport; I took my foot off the pedals and just steered it toward safety and it did what it need to do to keep me out of the ditch. I think its "just right" on the edge of fun and safety. If you don't want the nanny's, turn them off and its all up to you.

At the end of the day, you cant re-write the laws of physics on our planet (out in the universe is another matter). TC, ESC, Air bags, adaptive cruise, self-drive, self-park, ect; All these features can't solve every problem and objects in motion tend to stay in motion, until they encounter an equal or greater force to counter-balance them (or you hit a ditch, guardrail or another car).

All of this is just my $0.02
I've not tried TC off in comfort mode. I only tried in sport mode (with TC on) and I can't reproduce the scenario.
What I realised today is that it's definitely NOT the tires. I had it happen just after putting in the LSD (Limited Slip Differential) and before switching to the new tires. I didn't think much of it because it was raining but it was really unexpected. Same thing, I was accelerating hard on the highway from 100khp to 140kph (limit changed) in a straight line and the TC started flashing and cut power.

So, now the problem is like this:
- My open diff was changed to an LSD (Limited Slip Differential)
- TC now steps in aggressively (only in comfort mode) when I floor it at high speeds in a straight line (around 120 to 140kph)
- Sport mode works as before, with no TC interference

Notes:
- If I accelerate a little lighter or more linear, I can take it to 200kph, no problems. TC steps in only if the pedal is floored.
- I noticed it happening right after an upshift (3 to 4). Can't be sure if it happens only on upshifts, but don't think so.

What could be the cause of this? I'm sure it's not normal because it was not happening before the diff change. I've had this car for 170k km so I know it well.

Could it be software? LSD (Limited Slip Differential) needs new TC programming? Is this controlled by the ECU? Or the gearbox computer?

Or can it be hardware? Maybe the guys installing the new diff messed with an ABS sensor in the rear wheel? Does anyone know about any other sensors the TC is considering?
Reading your post just made me realize... i believe 7andrei7 has the 2.0 gt-Line ... did you get an LSD for the same ratio? the 2.0 has a different (higher number) rear end 3.727:1 than the 3.3tt GT 3.538:1 ... if this is the case the rear tires would be turning slower than the front causing the issue.
 

Attachments

  • kiaspecs.webp
    kiaspecs.webp
    75.5 KB · Views: 6
Yes, the LSD is from a 2.0 GT Line.
It came standard in the "frigid zones" of the EU on all 2.0 GT Line Stingers.
 
Yes, the LSD (Limited Slip Differential) is from a 2.0 GT Line.
It came standard in the "frigid zones" of the EU on all 2.0 GT Line Stingers.
Ok. That's awesome. Just wanted to make sure lol
 
Reading your post just made me realize... i believe 7andrei7 has the 2.0 gt-Line ... did you get an LSD (Limited Slip Differential) for the same ratio? the 2.0 has a different (higher number) rear end 3.727:1 than the 3.3tt GT 3.538:1 ... if this is the case the rear tires would be turning slower than the front causing the issue.
This would have been a very good explanation....

But, it seems it is not the case
 
great call out @vipeboy2000

That's interesting. For your sake @7Andrei7, I hope it was just dirty sensors.

The sensors work by creating a magnetic field between the sensor tip and the tone ring (looks like a "geared" or "toothed" metal ring) attached to the axle or internal to the wheel bearing. When the sensor is energized, as the tone wheel turns it affects the magnetic field, and creates a thing called a "sine wave" than can be read by an oscilloscope. The characteristics of the sine wave are what the cars compute translates into measuring the speed of the wheel. Any debris that could affect the characteristics of the magnetic field, will affect the characteristics of the sine wave, and in turn, will affect how the car interprets the wheels speed. Generally, water, surface dirt, mud, etc. will not affect it, Unless there are partials like hard metals, lead, anything with magnetic properties, etc. mixed in.... then the sensor could be affected.

The software in modern cars is a learning software... so its possible...



Snag_1676d8cc.webp
 
______________________________
From interior to exterior to high performance - everything you need for your Stinger awaits you...
Ok. That's awesome. Just wanted to make sure lol
But still, would that have changed anything on a 2WD car? The front wheels spin as fast as the car is moving so the same speed as the rear wheels, despite gear ration.

There could be a difference between whatever the ECM is reading inside the gearbox and what speed it's expecting to read from the wheel speed sensors. But that should trigger TC all the time, not just under hard acceleration at high speed.
I don't know, software annoys me. I'm sometimes defeated by my printer.

However, it's purely theoretical at this point. I'm 100% my diff is for the 2.0 because I made sure to check codes beforehand and they do differ in both open and limited slip.
The 3.3 diffs are J126 (limited) and J026(open). The 2.0 diffs are J120 (limited) and J020 (open).
 
Reading your post just made me realize... i believe 7andrei7 has the 2.0 gt-Line ... did you get an LSD (Limited Slip Differential) for the same ratio? the 2.0 has a different (higher number) rear end 3.727:1 than the 3.3tt GT 3.538:1 ... if this is the case the rear tires would be turning slower than the front causing the issue.

Just for future reference, different rear end gear ratios do not affect wheel speed. That is strictly a function of tire size. What is affected is the engine RPM (and drivetrain components upstream of the rear end) The higher the numerical gear ratio, the higher the engine RPM for the same car speed
 
Just for future reference, different rear end gear ratios do not affect wheel speed. That is strictly a function of tire size. What is affected is the engine RPM (and drivetrain components upstream of the rear end) The higher the numerical gear ratio, the higher the engine RPM for the same car speed
Correct. While the LSD is geared a bit higher (~5%) than the 2.0T's open diff, this has no bearing on how TC/SC operate. As long as the tires are the same, front and rear wheel speeds, as detected by the ABS sensors, will be exactly the same.

Our 2.0T RWD has had the LSD for more than a year now, with absolutely no issues. At the track, the car is always set on Sport mode and TC/SC disabled. If you are going to thrash the car around, you best turn off the safety nannies. Daily driving though, I'm in Comfort mode all the way.

Out on the open road, especially in wintery conditions and on slippery roads, it doesn't surprise me at all that TC/SC tries to reign in your fun factor, when you decide to go WOT in Comfort mode.
 
Small update from my side: the TC is still way more intrusive than before installing the LSD. It is manageable but a little weird because it cuts engine power in very unusual moments. And it only does it in comfort mode.

I will make a visit to the dealer after the holidays to see if there is any coding possible. Some way of telling the car that it now has a limited slip diff rather than an open diff. The parts are the same (ECM and speed sensors) so it is definitely some kind of software glitch.
If not, at least a general reset of all computers. Maybe that will fix it.
 
Back
Top