Tonkabob
2500 Posts Club!
Its not really a map change just a little boost. Everything else is the same.Isn't it bad to change maps back and forth?
The ECU needs time to readapt.
Its not really a map change just a little boost. Everything else is the same.Isn't it bad to change maps back and forth?
The ECU needs time to readapt.
View attachment 30566
I have an excel version but can't upload that but here is the csv. Run 7 was the +3 with timing pull.
Also seems the jb4 only does whole boost numbers. Aka 2.5 is 2.
This track has a hill and a turn so runs about .15 slow.
Terry,I can only open the original CSV file anyway. On boost you can set tenth of a psi resolution and appears you have.
The timing drops around timestamp 1070 appear to be a torque limiter of some sort. Does it do that consistently when doing runs at say +3psi? I'm not sure what the mechanism would be to trigger it. The higher the boost setting on the JB4 side the less likely hitting a torque limiter should be.
On the launch this is a standard "launch mode"? Do you have a similar log using the burnout switch? Make sure you load the windows JB4 software to view logs on the computer at home as the app while useful on the road makes it harder to spot trends in.
View attachment 30567
Ecu tune with a little extra jb4 boost.Terry,
How come his boost doesnt drop around shifts?
Its almost a flat line.![]()
Terry,
How come his boost doesnt drop around shifts?
Its almost a flat line.![]()
I only did one run at +3. John has been fighting with this limit at 21-22 psi, but at least we know it isn't a boost limit now.I can only open the original CSV file anyway. On boost you can set tenth of a psi resolution and appears you have.
The timing drops around timestamp 1070 appear to be a torque limiter of some sort. Does it do that consistently when doing runs at say +3psi? I'm not sure what the mechanism would be to trigger it. The higher the boost setting on the JB4 side the less likely hitting a torque limiter should be.
On the launch this is a standard "launch mode"? Do you have a similar log using the burnout switch? Make sure you load the windows JB4 software to view logs on the computer at home as the app while useful on the road makes it harder to spot trends in.
View attachment 30567
Windows software is posted here: N54Tech.com - International Turbo Racing Discussion - View Single Post - JB4 laptop connection directions
Just email yourself logs and open it in the software for more advanced analysis later. Software is designed to be really quick and easy for analysis.
If trap speed isn't improving much as you slightly increase boost, then your experience is similar to mine. Power peaks out around 18psi and while you can push boost up to 22psi (I have on the dyno) you won't make that much additional power.
I think the two keys for you will be getting full brake boost launching to work and then using the IAT function to keep timing up on warmer days at the track.
I’ve gotten similar results over several runs on different days. Two different tracks.I'm just curious how @Kato_the_kia_stinger put down his numbers. 11.599 @ 118.77, 7.464 @93.86, 1.614
Was this just a lucky run where everything hooked up, or does he (or anyone else) have a repeatable, reliable method? I'll have to try @Tonkabob method and see how it goes. crazy numbers here:
Drag/Acceleration - The Official 1/4 mile track thread.
Do I need some non 0 values in Map 6? I added no boost in map 6 and it didn't pick up my -5 in 1st gear so suspect it will not pick up the -8 either.ECU_PSI is the boost sent back to the DME. I can see it's higher than actual but may need to tweak it a bit. Next set 1st gear to 8psi, start the logging manually, and grab another log.
Do I need some non 0 values in Map 6? I added no boost in map 6 and it didn't pick up my -5 in 1st gear so suspect it will not pick up the -8 either.
Yes I see that. This ECU is odd, there must be another boost signal to the ECU. In the -5 PSI case the ECU saw fake 21 PSI, 14 actual PSI and cuts timing.Target doesn't display negative values but it picked up the -5psi.. It's easily viewable in log looking at ECU_PSI vs. actual.
Around 115 the ECU saw 25psi+ (we cap the reading in the log on that signal at 25.5psi so presumable more), with 23psi actual boost. It might be that if we let ECU_PSI get too high it triggers a cut out or fault.
Probably the basic problem we're dealing with here is the set point on your flash at the launch is around 20psi vs. around 14psi for factory flash cars, blowing off the tires, and we need to find a way do dynamically reduce that target just in that situation to allow it to launch cleanly. To do that we need to better understand what effect some of these signal changes have on your car. We can see on your map0 launch mode run boost gets up to 21psi off the line on its own so there is extra WGDC stuffed in there to hit that. In a perfect world we'd have EWG control setup and just dynamically lower wastegate dutycycle but we don't have that set on the Stinger JB4 end.
Need more data though so do as requested in the last post.
The car deals with high boost by first a #1 a big timing drop across all cylinders, #2 Throttle Cut, #3 Blow off.
Good explanation. I can see the more extreme throttle closure causes the blow off.I can see why you might think that but it's not exactly correct.
Timing is indexed on load (boost). The higher the boost the lower timing is mapped and timing will go down as boost goes up based on it's indexed mapping. Boost is governed primarily by a PID WGDC system with throttle integrated as a backstop. When boost goes over target PID aside the other response is proportional throttle closure. If you get enough throttle closure the difference between TMAP boost (psi in JB4 log) and manifold boost (psi2 in JB4 log) will be greater than the pressure holding the diverters closed and they will blow open. The diverter vacuum line also runs through a solenoid (unless you bypass it) allowing the ECU the option to open it more quickly when letting off the gas at higher RPM to better limit surging and the blow off noise.
Timing is generally reduced to limit toque not boost, for example when you're shifting timing is reduced momentarily and trans line pressure momentarily increased. That is the same behavior you're feeling now in park with the brake wire cut. The car would normally not increase line pressure when shifting in to drive at a stop to avoid that thud but with the cut it doesn't know your foot is on the brake.
On your timing drop as I said I think that is a torque limiter in the flash that needs to be raised. You'll need to do more runs like that to see if it's a trend or an outlier. Torque limiter interactions are normally really aggressive as we see in your log. In a perfect world we'd have boost set point and torque set point in the Stinger JB4 logs like we do on other models. I just haven't found a logging source for those yet to figure out how to log them.
You can see the basic operation in place in your other launch log. The launch boost target normally is around 0psi. Since throttle boost is is greater than 0psi the throttle closes proportionally so that manifold boost maintains the 0psi target. You'll note there is no timing reduction during this despite boost being so far over target throttle is closed to 40%. Timing is right where you'd expect it to be mapped for ~0psi.
View attachment 30626