Hi,
@Coast GT. Not tongue in cheek at all. "Nanny State" is an accusation. But don't take it personally. I just loathe Gov't oversight on the minutia of daily living.
I can accept that holding a camera is not illegal per se, but if in an accident you get that fact used against you: that is reasonable! "A man's got to know his limitations, yes sir." (Harry Callahan) But, there is no "look through a tiny camera lens" about it. You have full peripheral vision when you hold a camera out at arm's length and view the screen. So the law is perverse: it doesn't make looking through a camera viewer (eye hole) illegal: but it does holding a cellphone AS a camera? Makes no sense whatsoever.