Gas Prices:Premium or Regular. Have you switched.

In many prior cars it was usually the cheapest gas I could find. With my last few, including the Stinger, and especially with direct injection I'm all about putting the best things I can into the engine (gas, oil, plugs, etc). Top tier premium is the only thing that has ever been poured into the Stinger's tank.
 
With the 3.3 twin turbo, significant boost and 10 to 1 compression, you're asking for detonation if you go from premium to regular.

Not a smart thing to do to a modern, high performance engine.

Detroit, before they got the EV bug, was pressuring the majors to increase octane to allow them to use even high compression ratios to get better EPA mileage figures. Don

Sorry but that's just not correct. First off boost on the 3.3T is not significant at all. I've logged 87 with JB4 and it's just fine unless ambient air temp is on the hotter side. In fact, I've run my best 0-60 times on 87. If tuned, you'll need more octane.
 
Nope. I don't worry about gas too much. My job is about 15 minutes away and the Mrs works from home 95% of the time. If it gets to 10 bucks a gallon, then I'll start panicking. The Stinger (twin turbo) Lightning (supercharged) and E320 (over engineered German car) all take premium so I'm used to it. The Grand Cherokee is the only vehicle we have that calls for regular gas.
 
Last edited:
______________________________
Sorry but that's just not correct. First off boost on the 3.3T is not significant at all. I've logged 87 with JB4 and it's just fine unless ambient air temp is on the hotter side. In fact, I've run my best 0-60 times on 87. If tuned, you'll need more octane.
Good luck explaining that to anyone...
 
From interior to exterior to high performance - everything you need for your Stinger awaits you...
If I baby it I can get darn near 30 mpg on my commute, so that is my goto to save on fuel, not cheaper fuel. Plus you know, buildup blah blah blah walnuts.
 
If you can afford this car, you can afford the best fuel.

What is the best fuel to you? Top Tier fuel? Higher Octane? What are you trying to prevent or to achieve by putting in the "Best Fuel"? Seriously, let's discuss this because there is so much misinformation.
 
I've only had the Stinger fo about 2 months, so far only premium has gone in, and it's only been "top tier" premium. I do to the cheapest available, generally Costco.

On my previous 2 cars, bothe VW GTIs, they not only wanted premium, both seemed to picky about brand. BP and Shell were the two brands that seemed to give both the best gas mileage and power. Usually that mileage difference was enough to offset the increased price per gallon that those brands generally carried.

Has anyone seen a difference between brands that would be enough to make a difference over time?
 
What is the best fuel to you? Top Tier fuel? Higher Octane? What are you trying to prevent or to achieve by putting in the "Best Fuel"? Seriously, let's discuss this because there is so much misinformation.
Yes, top tier fuel. There is absolutely misinformation, and not all fuel is created equal. (car guys know the difference)
 
______________________________
From interior to exterior to high performance - everything you need for your Stinger awaits you...
Yes, top tier fuel. There is absolutely misinformation, and not all fuel is created equal. (car guys know the difference)
Does that mean that I am a "car guy" now? :D
 
Sorry but that's just not correct. First off boost on the 3.3T is not significant at all. I've logged 87 with JB4 and it's just fine unless ambient air temp is on the hotter side. In fact, I've run my best 0-60 times on 87. If tuned, you'll need more octane.
I don't have enough knowledge to argue about that topic, but can you elaborate on it little more? Are you saying 87 is better for our cars than 93? As long as it is not very hot.
 
What is the best fuel to you? Top Tier fuel? Higher Octane? What are you trying to prevent or to achieve by putting in the "Best Fuel"? Seriously, let's discuss this because there is so much misinformation.
I make every effort to use Shell on road trips. And at home I use Costco exclusively.
 
If you can afford this car, you can afford the best fuel.
This right here especially if you bought it new. I can understand wanting to be frugal, sure, but in reality if you're able and willing to buy a 40-50k performance car(For the GT folk), gas prices should not be bothering you. We're all adults and you can do as you please with your car but I can't fathom why anyone would buy a car like this and then throw 87 in it.
 
From interior to exterior to high performance - everything you need for your Stinger awaits you...
______________________________
I don't have enough knowledge to argue about that topic, but can you elaborate on it little more? Are you saying 87 is better for our cars than 93? As long as it is not very hot.
No, I'm not saying that. See below

This right here especially if you bought it new. I can understand wanting to be frugal, sure, but in reality if you're able and willing to buy a 40-50k performance car(For the GT folk), gas prices should not be bothering you. We're all adults and you can do as you please with your car but I can't fathom why anyone would buy a car like this and then throw 87 in it.

Ok, let's start by removing the money argument. If everyone on this forum was wealthy they wouldn't be driving a Kia Stinger. The fact the car cost 50K has exactly nothing to do with the required octane. If filling with more octane does nothing "better" for the engine, then you are a poor money manager and are throwing away your cash. I'm not into throwing away money and that's why I can afford a 50K car.

In terms of fuel "quality" I fully support the "Top Tier" standards because they reduce engine issues such as deposit build up that actually impacts an engines longevity and efficiency.


In terms of octane, this is simply the fuels ability to resist detonation (knock). So if you run 87 octane, which the 3.3T can run - it means that the car may have to reduce ignition timing or boost if the ECU see's knock. Seeing mild knock is completely normal in a stock engine, even if you run 91, 93 etc.. There is no "right" octane number. It depends on other variables such as temperature, humidity, elevation etc. I have found through JB4 logging that my car doesn't knock (pull timing) on 87 octane in Winter, Spring and Fall and most of Summer UNLESS the ambient temp is on the hotter side and heat soak starts. Let's say 80F or so... Now - even if the ECU does pull timing (knock) - it's not a bad thing.. it just means a bit less power. So again, there is no harm to the engine in any way.

Think of this... Some of the same people arguing that you must run 91 octane on a stock car, purchase tunes to increase power but still run the same octane they did when stock. If 91/93/94 was a MUST, then why would they stay on the same octane? Wouldn't that cause damage? It doesn't because there is headroom built into the factory tune. In other words, our engine's have a mild tune that is completely safe on 87.

Point #2 - Higher octane fuel is more resistant to detonation. This means it's burn is more controlled, which means it has a slower flame propagation.... which means less power. Science. The ultimate would be a variable octane fuel that can be adjusted based on things such as temp, pressure, humidity etc.. but that's not really possible on a stock car.

Do I think you should run 87 all the time. Nope. It's your choice. I'm just saying it's not a big deal and calling out those that do by saying they are cheap, makes no sense.

For those of you running 87.. I'll see you on the Porsche forums because we've saved enough to afford one ;)
 
Last edited:
No, I'm not saying that. See below



Ok, let's start by removing the money argument. If everyone on this forum was wealthy they wouldn't be driving a Kia Stinger. The fact the car cost 50K has exactly nothing to do with the required octane. If filling with more octane does nothing "better" for the engine, then you are a poor money manager and are throwing away your cash. I'm not into throwing away money and that's why I can afford a 50K car.

In terms of fuel "quality" I fully support the "Top Tier" standards because they reduce engine issues such as deposit build up that actually impacts an engines longevity and efficiency.


In terms of octane, this is simply the fuels ability to resist detonation (knock). So if you run 87 octane, which the 3.3T can run - it means that the car may have to reduce ignition timing or boost if the ECU see's knock. Seeing mild knock is completely normal in a stock engine, even if you run 91, 93 etc.. There is no "right" octane number. It depends on other variables such as temperature, humidity, elevation etc. I have found through JB4 logging that my car doesn't knock (pull timing) on 87 octane in Winter, Spring and Fall and most of Summer UNLESS the ambient temp is on the hotter side and heat soak starts. Let's say 80F or so... Now - even if the ECU does pull timing (knock) - it's not a bad thing.. it just means a bit less power. So again, there is no harm to the engine in any way.

Think of this... Some of the same people arguing that you must run 91 octane on a stock car, purchase tunes to increase power but still run the same octane they did when stock. If 91/93/94 was a MUST, then why would they stay on the same octane? Wouldn't that cause damage? It doesn't because there is headroom built into the factory tune. In other words, our engine's have a mild tune that is completely safe on 87.

Point #2 - Higher octane fuel is more resistant to detonation. This means it's burn is more controlled, which means it has a slower flame propagation.... which means less power. Science. The ultimate would be a variable octane fuel that can be adjusted based on things such as temp, pressure, humidity etc.. but that's not really possible on a stock car.

Do I think you should run 87 all the time. Nope. It's your choice. I'm just saying it's not a big deal and calling out those that do by saying they are cheap, makes no sense.

For those of you running 87.. I'll see you on the Porsche forums because we've saved enough to afford one ;)
In post #25 I said - good luck.

in post #37 - you came through. Well done my friend. I support your message
 
Sorry but that's just not correct. First off boost on the 3.3T is not significant at all. I've logged 87 with JB4 and it's just fine unless ambient air temp is on the hotter side. In fact, I've run my best 0-60 times on 87. If tuned, you'll need more octane.
You're not stock, irrelevant. This site has said the stock 3.3 makes 14psi boost. That's significant. Kia says use premium, you know better? Really? Don
 
You're not stock, irrelevant. This site has said the stock 3.3 makes 14psi boost. That's significant. Kia says use premium, you know better? Really? Don

Test was stock. Read my post again. 14psi is nothing for this motor. Kia "recommends" premium. Data logs don't lie.

.. so yeah, really.
 
From interior to exterior to high performance - everything you need for your Stinger awaits you...
Back
Top