Which is why I stated
typically.
Btw, Kia outselling Hyundai domestically in 2016 didn't include commercial sales; since then, probably have been months where Kia has outsold Hyundai including commercial sales.
But much of that has to do w/ timing - when certain models get replaced and there is a lag in sales or is due to the somewhat different mix of models offered by Kia (for instance, Kia has the Sedona minivan which is popular).
But (again) typically, where the 2 compete head-to-head, the Hyundai counterpart outsells the Kia.
One of the few exceptions was w/ the previous gen Optima - which at times outsold the Sonata.
The Korean market wasn't keen on the overly busy design of the Sonata and the Optima was also just the all-around better of the 2 models.
Currently, the
Sorento is outselling the SWB Santa Fe, but the SF is at the end of its life-cycle and is about to be replaced by the all-new SF.
Hyundai is once again outselling Kia (including the Sonata outselling the Optima) - led by the Grandeur (which would have been the new Azera here) which has been the best selling model in Korea.
The Cadenza is a good bit better than the discontinued (here) Azera, but the Cadenza never came close to being the #1 selling model over there.
Also, the Equus sold a good bit better than the K9/K900 and its replacement, the EQ900/
G90 has been a runaway success for Hyundai in its domestic market (getting 4,300 pre-orders within 24 hours and over 10k within a week).
Kia's goal for the new K9 is
20k in domestic sales, but think that's a pretty optimistic goal.
Hyundai (and now Genesis) has been far more established in the luxury market with the Genesis/
G80 and Equus/EQ900 (than Kia with the K9) - so the
G70 is an easier sell - having had its larger siblings blaze the trail, so to speak.
"Don't think Kia held anything back due to what Genesis was doing w/ the G70, but rather held back (mostly w/ respect to the interior) due to what they thought they could realistically charge."
Realistically Charge?! Obviously they can realistically charge the same price or less in other markets that have a Stinger with more features than the US...
Yes, there's some variance in pricing depending on markets, but Kia (like Hyundai before it w/ the original
Genesis sedan) tempered what they did for the interior to keep pricing down.
Along the same lines, it's the reason why the interiors in the ATS/CTS, Jaguar XE/XF and Alfa Giuiia aren't quite up to par - w/ those automakers having spend more of their R&D $$ into the architecture/platform or powertrains.
Kia also had to make some compromises as the Stinger is not only larger/longer than the
G70, but the fastback bodystyle w/ the hatch requires more structural bracing and is more expensive to manufacture (which is why the 4 Series Gran Coupe and the A5/S5 are a good bit more expensive than their 4-door counterparts).
The Hyundai Motor Group which incorporates both companies as they own a part of each other with Hyundai owning more of Kia than Kia owns of Hyundai. So it makes logical sense for them to decontent the Stinger to make the
G70 look more luxurious in the US as it has nothing to do with costs, that is just an excuse.
Hyundai Motor has around a 33% stake in Kia Motors.
Kia, in turn, has varying stake-holds in a number of Hyundai subsidiaries (including the steel mill where both have an ownership stake), but it's unclear if Kia Motors has a direct stake in Hyundai Motors.
Either way, that's immaterial.
Hyundai does not dictate to Kia what models they are to develop or to what level they can appoint the interiors.
Again, why would Kia
decontent the Stinger to make the
G70 look
more luxurious when most Kia models have
better interiors than their Hyundai counterparts (and that's not even including the premium upgrade offered by the
SX-L trim for which Hyundai has
no counterpart)?
The interiors of the SX-L trims of the
Sorento, Optima and Cadenza blow away the interiors of the Santa Fe Sport, Sonata and Azera.
Why isn't Hyundai concerned about that?
And the interior of the new K9/K900 looks to be at least on par w/ that of the
G90 (the outgoing K9/K900, imo, actually having a better interior than the Equus).
Hyundai has created a new brand with Genesis and more than likely trying to build the brand up with the
G70 along with them starting the N Performance with Albert Biermann (Who engineered the Stinger) heading it. To me it appears Hyundai comes first...
Not disagreeing that Hyundai usually gets first dibs when it comes to new platforms or powertrains, but again, they don't direct Kia in the type of models they can develop or what level of amenities or appointment they can offer.
For example, not only does the
Sportage have a nicer interior than the Tucson, the
Sportage is available w/ the
2.0T whereas the Tucson tops out w/ the
1.6T (now, the Tucson will be getting an N-variant, but that's a recent development and the N performance line was just an idea when the current Tucson and
Sportage were being developed).
"Now, a lot of that had to do w/ the lower price-point when it was sold as a Hyundai, w/ the price gradually increasing over the years and then increasing a good bit when it became a Genesis (in large part to price-in the service amenities such as loaners, complimentary maintenance, valet service, etc. - those things aren't free)."
How are they not free when Genesis states "Complimentary" and I can't find anything revealing hidden charges, if there are any. Is there something stating otherwise, if so please share....
Such amenities are not
free b/c they are priced into the MSRP!
That
complimentary maintenance that BMW touts isn't really
free, nor are such things such as complimentary
loaners, etc
.
That's the reason why the
Genesis sedan was more of a bargain (in comparison to its competition) than the Equus - as the Equus had the service amenities (such as valet service) priced into its MSRP.
Once the
G80 started getting similar amenities w/ the start of the Genesis brand, the price of the
G80 went up.