3.3T Turbo Oil Feed Line Recall 2024

Initially, I thought perhaps you posted in the wrong thread.

But then I realized, this is your oil feed pipe recall substitute - fire mitigation.

Well played!
I thought I made an error once, but I was mistaken.

Yes, this is part of that mitigation, but mostly just a good idea to have for any emergency…yours or to help someone else.

I’m still looking for an automatic, clean, under-hood solution. I’ve been in contact with a few manufacturers to alter solutions for other purposes. Race car systems are too complex, intrusive, and expensive.

Stay tuned.
 
Does moving the seat forward push or move the canister?
I chose to set the seat to the most forward position my passengers would use and set the extinguisher snug to there.

The Bracketeer has flexibility to place the extinguisher another inch or more forward. Not sure if that would exceed the seat’s most forward position. But I didn’t want the extinguisher to interfere with passenger’s comfort or ingress/egress.

It would work behind the seat as well, but only if your rear seat passenger had no feet.
 
______________________________
Initially, I thought perhaps you posted in the wrong thread.

But then I realized, this is your oil feed pipe recall substitute - fire mitigation.

Well played!

Same thing I did when I 1st heard about this recall:

Screenshot 2024-07-24 at 9.19.15 PM.webp
 
From interior to exterior to high performance - everything you need for your Stinger awaits you...
Amateurs!

Yeah, I looked at BlazeCut and FireSlayer (THIA by PROTENG, the company the BlazeCut founders worked for and who claim they stole the technology) but I don’t think the volume/pressure of their FM-200 is sufficient to quench a pressurized oil-fed fire. Their focus seems to be electrical fires where a quick, smothering blast is sufficient to knock out flame (like the pan of gas fire that BlazeCut shows in their demos). Our need calls for knocking down the blaze and continuing to douse the oil spray/hot surfaces until recombustion is less likely.

I did request that they investigate the addition of a 10-pound tank to supplement the volume in the tube, keeping the tube “detection”/localized nozzle technique.

Want the engineer’s number?
 
Last edited:
Yeah, I looked at BlazeCut and FireSlayer (THIA by PROTENG, the company the BlazeCut founders worked for and who claim they stole the technology) but I don’t think the volume/pressure of their FM-200 is sufficient to quench a pressurized oil-fed fire. Their focus seems to be electrical fires where a quick, smothering blast is sufficient to knock out flame (like the pan of gas fire that BlazeCut shows in their demos). Our need calls for knocking down the blaze and continuing to douse the oil spray/hot surfaces until recombination is less likely.

I did request that they investigate the addition of a 10-pound tank to supplement the volume in the tube, keeping the tube “detection”/localized nozzle technique.

Want the engineer’s number?
Yeah, a simulated fire is just that, simulated. A puddle of oil/gas on fire doesn't have a re-ignition source. In a real fire you still have an engine hot enough to start combustion, and oil/gas waiting to reignite.

It's the difference between blowing out a propane BBQ vs charcoal. It's also why those solid state extinguishers don't always work.
 
______________________________
From interior to exterior to high performance - everything you need for your Stinger awaits you...
Driver dumped water on the small engine fire which looks like it did the job but water in general is a no no for these types of fires…right?
 
Driver dumped water on the small engine fire which looks like it did the job but water in general is a no no for these types of fires…right?
You were thinking of an oil fire in a kitchen.

This tiny oil fire on an engine, I would certainly use water if there was nothing else available. Water would not be my first choice, but clearly water was the right choice versus doing nothing
 
You were thinking of an oil fire in a kitchen.

This tiny oil fire on an engine, I would certainly use water if there was nothing else available. Water would not be my first choice, but clearly water was the right choice versus doing nothing
Agreed. And much less messy than some pulverized solid all over your engine.
 
Just got my Stinger back. They took pretty much all day for it as well as the brake booster recall. Didn't overheat on the way home. It did smell like coolant more than usual, but I imagine they spilled some. I'll keep my eye on levels.

Even with the tech in the car hearing the popping in the stereo they still couldn't do anything except if I wanted them to keep the car and they could open a ticket with Kia Corporate. I said "no thanks" and made sure they didn't charge me the diagnosis fee of $139. Then drove my "freshly washed" car home (kia washed it) and got home and wiped all the water spots off the windows and mirrors.. haha..
 
From interior to exterior to high performance - everything you need for your Stinger awaits you...
Just got my Stinger back. They took pretty much all day for it as well as the brake booster recall. Didn't overheat on the way home. It did smell like coolant more than usual, but I imagine they spilled some. I'll keep my eye on levels.

Even with the tech in the car hearing the popping in the stereo they still couldn't do anything except if I wanted them to keep the car and they could open a ticket with Kia Corporate. I said "no thanks" and made sure they didn't charge me the diagnosis fee of $139. Then drove my "freshly washed" car home (kia washed it) and got home and wiped all the water spots off the windows and mirrors.. haha..
Could they not open the ticket with Kia corporate, and let you take the car back?

The absolutely should be opening a support ticket with Kia corporate, since they are unable to diagnose the issue on their own!
 
______________________________
Who knows. I even showed him this thread with all the important parts about the coils etc. But they said they checked the coils and they looked fine.
 
I decided to check the oil to make sure they didn't overfill it because, as I understand, they change the oil when doing the recall. Oil wasn't changed. It was a dirty (50%... getting a change this fall either way). So they didn't change the oil. No idea if they did the coolant.
 
I decided to check the oil to make sure they didn't overfill it because, as I understand, they change the oil when doing the recall. Oil wasn't changed. It was a dirty (50%... getting a change this fall either way). So they didn't change the oil. No idea if they did the coolant.
There are no instructions to change the engine oil during the recall work. Less than half the engine oil is spilled, and they have to replace what was lost. Nearly all of the coolant is replaced (not flushed) when they drain the coolant from the bottom of the rad on step #4 of the recall procedure..

Up to 3 quarts of oil are included in the recall kit.
 
There are no instructions to change the engine oil during the recall work. Less than half the engine oil is spilled, and they have to replace what was lost. Nearly all of the coolant is replaced (not flushed) when they drain the coolant from the bottom of the rad on step #4 of the recall procedure..

Up to 3 quarts of oil are included in the recall kit.
The work order doesn't show any of that
 
From interior to exterior to high performance - everything you need for your Stinger awaits you...
Back
Top