Stinger vs. Infiniti Q50 Redsport

[Kamauxx]

I live my life a 1/4 mile at a time. Well I am not Vin Diesel Mmmmm. Soon I will line up with my Nephews RED Sport but he already put a AEM cold air intake on and a cat back. I really don't think he was that impressed with power gains but enjoys the sound. He is Leasing his car also so I don't know if he is going to get a tune. . He just might DRAG my AZZ we will see. waiting for the weather to break

According to Motortrend the Q50 RS is a 13 second 109 mph car in the quarter.

According to Car and Driver the RWD Stinger is a 12.9 second 111 mph car in the quarter.

So with his mods and you being stock (?) I'd say it's a driver's race.

2016 Infiniti Q50 Red Sport 400 First Test: Track-Testing the Most Powerful Q50 - Motor Trend

2018 Kia Stinger GT Test | Review | Car and Driver

 

[berndes]

Hi Guys,

I had a test drive with both cars.
My oppinion before the drives was, that I will buy a Q50, because the exterieur looks better for me and it has the more powerful engine.
After I have driven both, my opinion has changed.
Here are the reasons:
The q50 is speed limited to 250km/h (that is changeable)
In Germany it is allowed to drive full speed and it is fun to pass all the limited Audis, Mercedes,..... (Stinger runs 274km/h without tuning)
The noise cancellation of the q50 (Bose) es extremely efficient - you hear nothing in the car, but I want to hear the engine.

The q50s voice recognition system is horrible - that is like my 2010 Chrysler town&country and not like a 2018 Model.
It takes so long time to place a phone call or a new target in navigation (my 2015 Cadillac CTS is much better as the Q50 and the Stinger is on the same level)

But the killer feature for me was: The Automatic Cruise Control stops working if the car stops behind a car for excample in a traffic jam. Than you have to place your foot on the break. I use it in my Cadillac everytime. In taht car and also in the stinger the ACC is still active until you press the break or you stop it via the button on the seering wheel. If the traffic in front of you allows it, you have only to tic on the throttle or the button on the wheel to start the car.

So after that I decided to buy a Stinger

Excuse my bad english

cheers
Berndes

 

[MTM S4]

OK, I guess I'm not a Fanboy. I paid $38.5 for my GT1 with Driver Assist and RWD which I think compares to your Q50 RS and I think the AMG would be way north of that cost. The top cost for a GT2 AWD in around $52k, still looks like $9k less than the Infinity. I will never look at cars in the $60k price range so Kia fills the gap very well.

You aren't a fanboy. I'm sorry if I was confusing you. In my opinion, there is a fan and a fanboy.

$38.5K is a great deal on a GT1 w/ the Driver Assist Pack. That ranges in the 44K sticker range, I believe. Good buy.

The GT2 is the only KIA Stinger that will cost more than the Q50 RS (assuming the average 8-15K off discounts Infiniti usually gives on the Q.) From what I saw on forums, through research on both the Stinger/Q50 for my cousin, Q buyers tend to have got their car for at least 8K off and some on the high end of 15K off).

Again - if you are looking for a car with 340i/C43 AMG performance for under 40K, the GT1 is the choice to be. It pretty much gives you all the performance, all the power, all the handling, and the RWD for thousands less. If that's what your looking for, its the clear choice. Which is why I still stated it was a good car. The thing is - I think the Q50 RS might be better but that's subjected to the cost of the car.

The way I see it is - because Acura/Lexus don't have a 340i/C43 AMG/S4 competitor. People who like Japanese cars will be forced to buy a Infiniti Q50 RS if they pretty much want a Japanese "Version" of the 340i/C43 AMG/S4. The Q50 RS is the way for the Japanese to undercut the German competition for business. Just like the way the KIA Stinger is undercutting the luxury competition for business. This is why I also think its hard to compare a Q50 RS to a Stinger. Its pretty much comparing a luxury sports car to a sports car. (Side note: I know Infiniti isn't as "luxurious" as say the German counterparts - but it is still a luxury vehicle. The Q50 RS interior still reminds you with premium feeling material. Things like the snitching and patterned seats all the way to soft touch material for the knees and etc...)

According to Motortrend the Q50 RS is a 13 second 109 mph car in the quarter.

According to Car and Driver the RWD Stinger is a 12.9 second 111 mph car in the quarter.

So with his mods and you being stock (?) I'd say it's a driver's race.

Please - lets be fair about this. If you are going to compare car times, use the car times from the same article source. Meaning - you should quote MotorTrend for the Q50 RS then use MotorTrend for the RWD Stinger. The way you did was pick and choose articles. This leaves you with a bias swing. You posted the time where the KIA Stinger GT was faster purposely to prove a point.

According to MotorTrend, the KIA Stinger GT did 60 in 4.8 Seconds and quarter mile to 13.3 seconds at 106.9 MPH.
"Korean-branded cars usually aren't synonymous with performance, but the rear-drive Stinger GT launches from 0 to 60 mph in 4.8 seconds and clocks the standing quarter mile in 13.3 seconds at 106.9 mph."


Like you said - the Infiniti Q50 RS did it 0-60 in 4.5 seconds and the quarter mile at 13 second and 109 MPH.


For the Car and Driver times: You have the Q50 RS reaching 60 at 4.5 with the Stinger GT reaching it at 4.4. Similarity - the 1/4 for the Q50 RS is 13 flat with the Stinger GT at 12.9.

The .1 second difference could be the car or driver input.

Define the time show you want to but please next time, use the same source for the same car.

DISCLAIMER: I can't post links because I'm a new member. So google them

 

[Paul32]

You aren't a fanboy. I'm sorry if I was confusing you. In my opinion, there is a fan and a fanboy.

$38.5K is a great deal on a GT1 w/ the Driver Assist Pack. That ranges in the 44K sticker range, I believe. Good buy.

The GT2 is the only KIA Stinger that will cost more than the Q50 RS (assuming the average 8-15K off discounts Infiniti usually gives on the Q.) From what I saw on forums, through research on both the Stinger/Q50 for my cousin, Q buyers tend to have got their car for at least 8K off and some on the high end of 15K off).

Again - if you are looking for a car with 340i/C43 AMG performance for under 40K, the GT1 is the choice to be. It pretty much gives you all the performance, all the power, all the handling, and the RWD for thousands less. If that's what your looking for, its the clear choice. Which is why I still stated it was a good car. The thing is - I think the Q50 RS might be better but that's subjected to the cost of the car.

The way I see it is - because Acura/Lexus don't have a 340i/C43 AMG/S4 competitor. People who like Japanese cars will be forced to buy a Infiniti Q50 RS if they pretty much want a Japanese "Version" of the 340i/C43 AMG/S4. The Q50 RS is the way for the Japanese to undercut the German competition for business. Just like the way the KIA Stinger is undercutting the luxury competition for business. This is why I also think its hard to compare a Q50 RS to a Stinger. Its pretty much comparing a luxury sports car to a sports car. (Side note: I know Infiniti isn't as "luxurious" as say the German counterparts - but it is still a luxury vehicle. The Q50 RS interior still reminds you with premium feeling material. Things like the snitching and patterned seats all the way to soft touch material for the knees and etc...)



Please - lets be fair about this. If you are going to compare car times, use the car times from the same article source. Meaning - you should quote MotorTrend for the Q50 RS then use MotorTrend for the RWD Stinger. The way you did was pick and choose articles. This leaves you with a bias swing. You posted the time where the KIA Stinger GT was faster purposely to prove a point.

According to MotorTrend, the KIA Stinger GT did 60 in 4.8 Seconds and quarter mile to 13.3 seconds at 106.9 MPH.
"Korean-branded cars usually aren't synonymous with performance, but the rear-drive Stinger GT launches from 0 to 60 mph in 4.8 seconds and clocks the standing quarter mile in 13.3 seconds at 106.9 mph."


Like you said - the Infiniti Q50 RS did it 0-60 in 4.5 seconds and the quarter mile at 13 second and 109 MPH.


For the Car and Driver times: You have the Q50 RS reaching 60 at 4.5 with the Stinger GT reaching it at 4.4. Similarity - the 1/4 for the Q50 RS is 13 flat with the Stinger GT at 12.9.

The .1 second difference could be the car or driver input.

Define the time show you want to but please next time, use the same source for the same car.

DISCLAIMER: I can't post links because I'm a new member. So google them

$38.5K is a great deal on a GT1 w/ the Driver Assist Pack. That ranges in the 44K sticker range, I believe. Good buy.

Actually the GT1 with DA is $46,200. And I would like to see a Q50 RS discounted by $15k.

 

[NS_Stinger]

So I was cross shopping the Q50RS and the Stinger but never ended up test driving a Q50 because the cargo room advantage with the Stinger made it an easy choice. What i will say is I did sit in a Q50RS and the material quality inside did seem to be superior to the Stinger, it didnt blow it out of the water or anything but it felt more plush and premium inside than the stinger does.

 

[Paul32]

So I was cross shopping the Q50RS and the Stinger but never ended up test driving a Q50 because the cargo room advantage with the Stinger made it an easy choice. What i will say is I did sit in a Q50RS and the material quality inside did seem to be superior to the Stinger, it didnt blow it out of the water or anything but it felt more plush and premium inside than the stinger does.

I think it looks more on the luxury side where the Stinger is sporty. I would say the same thing if I were looking at the Cadenza compared to the Stinger.

 

[Paul32]

You aren't a fanboy. I'm sorry if I was confusing you. In my opinion, there is a fan and a fanboy.

$38.5K is a great deal on a GT1 w/ the Driver Assist Pack. That ranges in the 44K sticker range, I believe. Good buy.

The GT2 is the only KIA Stinger that will cost more than the Q50 RS (assuming the average 8-15K off discounts Infiniti usually gives on the Q.) From what I saw on forums, through research on both the Stinger/Q50 for my cousin, Q buyers tend to have got their car for at least 8K off and some on the high end of 15K off).

Again - if you are looking for a car with 340i/C43 AMG performance for under 40K, the GT1 is the choice to be. It pretty much gives you all the performance, all the power, all the handling, and the RWD for thousands less. If that's what your looking for, its the clear choice. Which is why I still stated it was a good car. The thing is - I think the Q50 RS might be better but that's subjected to the cost of the car.

The way I see it is - because Acura/Lexus don't have a 340i/C43 AMG/S4 competitor. People who like Japanese cars will be forced to buy a Infiniti Q50 RS if they pretty much want a Japanese "Version" of the 340i/C43 AMG/S4. The Q50 RS is the way for the Japanese to undercut the German competition for business. Just like the way the KIA Stinger is undercutting the luxury competition for business. This is why I also think its hard to compare a Q50 RS to a Stinger. Its pretty much comparing a luxury sports car to a sports car. (Side note: I know Infiniti isn't as "luxurious" as say the German counterparts - but it is still a luxury vehicle. The Q50 RS interior still reminds you with premium feeling material. Things like the snitching and patterned seats all the way to soft touch material for the knees and etc...)



Please - lets be fair about this. If you are going to compare car times, use the car times from the same article source. Meaning - you should quote MotorTrend for the Q50 RS then use MotorTrend for the RWD Stinger. The way you did was pick and choose articles. This leaves you with a bias swing. You posted the time where the KIA Stinger GT was faster purposely to prove a point.

According to MotorTrend, the KIA Stinger GT did 60 in 4.8 Seconds and quarter mile to 13.3 seconds at 106.9 MPH.
"Korean-branded cars usually aren't synonymous with performance, but the rear-drive Stinger GT launches from 0 to 60 mph in 4.8 seconds and clocks the standing quarter mile in 13.3 seconds at 106.9 mph."


Like you said - the Infiniti Q50 RS did it 0-60 in 4.5 seconds and the quarter mile at 13 second and 109 MPH.


For the Car and Driver times: You have the Q50 RS reaching 60 at 4.5 with the Stinger GT reaching it at 4.4. Similarity - the 1/4 for the Q50 RS is 13 flat with the Stinger GT at 12.9.

The .1 second difference could be the car or driver input.

Define the time show you want to but please next time, use the same source for the same car.

DISCLAIMER: I can't post links because I'm a new member. So google them

I did a price check on cars.com looking at all Q50 RS's and Stinger GT2's. The search was for all postings within 500 miles of Miami. The lowest price Q50 was $48,435 only one, the next lowest was $50,000. The Stinger's lowest price was $40,435 for the GT2. That's why I did not consider or would not consider the Q50. Again mine was $38,500. I know there are additional rebates on the Stingers that don't show up on car.com, big rebates. I don't know about the Q50 though.

 

[MTM S4]

Actually the GT1 with DA is $46,200. And I would like to see a Q50 RS discounted by $15k.

Oh. Thanks for the correction the Stinger price!

But yeah - if you go to leasehacker or browse through Infiniti forums - you can find people getting up to 23% off the Infiniti Q50 RS. Some people getting even more than that. Its widely known that Infiniti dealers have insane incentives on the Q50 (this is from my research of the vehicle when I was helping my cousin look into both cars.)

From time to time - I browse to ClubLexus as well. There was a Q50 RS owner there that wrote a review on his car. He purchased his car for 11K off MSRP.

No one buys Infiniti Q50 at sticker price. An Infiniti Q50 RS is not worth over 55K.

So I was cross shopping the Q50RS and the Stinger but never ended up test driving a Q50 because the cargo room advantage with the Stinger made it an easy choice. What i will say is I did sit in a Q50RS and the material quality inside did seem to be superior to the Stinger, it didnt blow it out of the water or anything but it felt more plush and premium inside than the stinger does.

Definitely. The Stinger has more cargo room and more utility. That would make it an easy choice for someone looking for space. The Q50 is quite a cramp vehicle.

Secondly - the last part of your post about the interior is what I meant in my previous post where people got upset about me saying the Infiniti interior was better than the Stinger.
I wasn't suggesting the Infiniti BLEW the Stinger interior out of the water like the Infiniti was some sort of Audi or Merc. I was merely referencing that the Infiniti had more premium material and more soft touches than the Stinger. It has more to a point where it made the Infiniti Q50 look/feel more premium. This is not to take away the KIA Stinger interior though. Its still a good interior - its just the Q50 RS interior feels more premium which it should for the price difference and badging.

 

[Soca Boy]

Google 2018 best interiors/best designs/best new cars/best brands/best what ever you want related to cars, don’t matter what site you pick the KIA Stinger pops up. What doesn’t pop up is a Q50, it’s outdated. The fact that a “KIA” can make a BMW(the benchmark) scared at a red light says a lot.

 

[MTM S4]

Google 2018 best interiors/best designs/best new cars/best brands/best what ever you want related to cars, don’t matter what site you pick the KIA Stinger pops up. What doesn’t pop up is a Q50, it’s outdated. The fact that a “KIA” can make a BMW(the benchmark) scared at a red light says a lot.

The hell? Just because you google "2018 Best car interiors" and Infiniti Q50 don't show up means the Infiniti Q50 interior is bad? Because a Google algorithm didn't show it on images? That's a null argument, to be honest.

But lets play your game:
I googled, "2018 Best car interiors".
In images, I got: out of the first 33 images. There is no KIA Stinger nor Infiniti Q50. But there is a 2018 Honda CR-V. Does this mean the CR-V has a premium like interior? No.

In Search results, I got a few websites:
In these websites, I one of them from Cars US News, they ranked KIA, Honda and Chrysler to have better interiors than Porsche and Mercedes Benz. This gotta be a joke, no? We can all admit, Mercedes Benz interior is the benchmark right now for premium interiors. Nothing beats it within the 50K market.
Second website (autotrader) ranks the best interior cars for under 50K.
Surprise surprise - you just lied. You claim the Q50 doesn't show up. It does. The Infiniti Q60 (which carries a similar interior in as the Q50 RS in the 2018 model) shows up on this website. What doesn't show up is the KIA Stinger.

Ward listed the Toyota Camry as the #1 best interior in 2018. This beats out tons and tons of expensive and cheaper cars. Does this mean the Camry has the best interior in the game? No. You have to realize "best" interior doesn't mean "more premium" interior.

Lastly - my final point on this matter. You call the Q50 RS interior outdated? That is false. The infotainment system is outdated - not the interior. However - the KIA infotainment system is just as outdated and even more outdated. The KIA System is horrible for 40-50K. Its just outrageous - if you opt for the GT1 or GT2, you should get an upgraded system.

Who says BMW or BMW owners are scared of a KIA? That's subjective at best and has no facts behind it.
1) The KIA doesn't compete in this benchmark.
2) The current 340i and the newer coming G20 M340i has nothing to worry about regarding the KIA Stinger. BMW owners aren't going to cross-shop with KIA dealers. That's just statistically proven. M340i is marked in the 60K range - people at that price point probably cares a little bit more about brand.

 

[Soca Boy]

The hell? Just because you google "2018 Best car interiors" and Infiniti Q50 don't show up means the Infiniti Q50 interior is bad? Because a Google algorithm didn't show it on images? That's a null argument, to be honest.

But lets play your game:
I googled, "2018 Best car interiors".
In images, I got: out of the first 33 images. There is no KIA Stinger nor Infiniti Q50. But there is a 2018 Honda CR-V. Does this mean the CR-V has a premium like interior? No.

In Search results, I got a few websites:
In these websites, I one of them from Cars US News, they ranked KIA, Honda and Chrysler to have better interiors than Porsche and Mercedes Benz. This gotta be a joke, no? We can all admit, Mercedes Benz interior is the benchmark right now for premium interiors. Nothing beats it within the 50K market.
Second website (autotrader) ranks the best interior cars for under 50K.
Surprise surprise - you just lied. You claim the Q50 doesn't show up. It does. The Infiniti Q60 (which carries a similar interior in as the Q50 RS in the 2018 model) shows up on this website. What doesn't show up is the KIA Stinger.

Ward listed the Toyota Camry as the #1 best interior in 2018. This beats out tons and tons of expensive and cheaper cars. Does this mean the Camry has the best interior in the game? No. You have to realize "best" interior doesn't mean "more premium" interior.

Lastly - my final point on this matter. You call the Q50 RS interior outdated? That is false. The infotainment system is outdated - not the interior. However - the KIA infotainment system is just as outdated and even more outdated. The KIA System is horrible for 40-50K. Its just outrageous - if you opt for the GT1 or GT2, you should get an upgraded system.

Who says BMW or BMW owners are scared of a KIA? That's subjective at best and has no facts behind it.
1) The KIA doesn't compete in this benchmark.
2) The current 340i and the newer coming G20 M340i has nothing to worry about regarding the KIA Stinger. BMW owners aren't going to cross-shop with KIA dealers. That's just statistically proven. M340i is marked in the 60K range - people at that price point probably cares a little bit more about brand.

The fact that I pissed you off made my day. You said you have a Audi but came here to defend an outdated Q50.

 

[xot1]

The q50 interior is ugly tbh.
I don't know how some people prefer it to the Stinger.
More premium materials to the touch? Why would someone want to touch that interior in the first place?

 

[MTM S4]

The fact that I pissed you off made my day. You said you have a Audi but came here to defend an outdated Q50.

Who's mad? Lol. I'm not even sure how you got "mad" from what I posted. I just called out your irrelevant argument as a form of debate. That's all. Judging by your non-rebuttal, I take it that you know how ridiculous it is to google "best interiors" and let the Internet decide rather than touching the material.

Again - I'm here because I was figuring out the Kia stinger and wanted to learn more about it.

And hey - I'm all for a debate but you just won't debate. Please list the reasons you think the Q is outdated rather just screaming it at the top of your lungs like a hater.

I'll tell you mind: the infotainment system in the Q is outdated. That's just a fact. But the interior, the materials and the quality is not outdated. It's better made than the KIA stinger. Whether you admit that or not, that's just facts. Sure - you drive a Stinger so it's hard for you to admit but I personally don't care about both cars. I'm more laughing at the fanboy-ism.

The q50 interior is ugly tbh.
I don't know how some people prefer it to the Stinger.
More premium materials to the touch? Why would someone want to touch that interior in the first place?

Again - laughing at the fanboy-ism which is toxic. Saying a comment like that leaves room for anyone else in the luxury brand market to say, "Why would some want to get into a KIA in the first place?" This just leads to toxic insults and etc... Like I said before - post your ideas. I.E. Why do you think the Infiniti interior is junk? Have you driven one? Have you actually test drove? Have you actually sat in it and played with all the switches? If you haven't, then you just don't know.

The interior design is subjective at best. I find neither the KIA stinger or Infiniti Q50 to be drop dead gorgeous. But if we talk about materials, it's clear the infiniti just has it better. I'm not saying the Stinger material sucks. The stinger material is actually good but I'm just saying the Infiniti material is better. But somehow this gets your panties twisted. Lol.

 

[xot1]

Who's mad? Lol. I'm not even sure how you got "mad" from what I posted. I just called out your irrelevant argument as a form of debate. That's all. Judging by your non-rebuttal, I take it that you know how ridiculous it is to google "best interiors" and let the Internet decide rather than touching the material.

Again - I'm here because I was figuring out the Kia stinger and wanted to learn more about it.

And hey - I'm all for a debate but you just won't debate. Please list the reasons you think the Q is outdated rather just screaming it at the top of your lungs like a hater.

I'll tell you mind: the infotainment system in the Q is outdated. That's just a fact. But the interior, the materials and the quality is not outdated. It's better made than the KIA stinger. Whether you admit that or not, that's just facts. Sure - you drive a Stinger so it's hard for you to admit but I personally don't care about both cars. I'm more laughing at the fanboy-ism.



Again - laughing at the fanboy-ism which is toxic. Saying a comment like that leaves room for anyone else in the luxury brand market to say, "Why would some want to get into a KIA in the first place?" This just leads to toxic insults and etc... Like I said before - post your ideas. I.E. Why do you think the Infiniti interior is junk? Have you driven one? Have you actually test drove? Have you actually sat in it and played with all the switches? If you haven't, then you just don't know.

The interior design is subjective at best. I find neither the KIA stinger or Infiniti Q50 to be drop dead gorgeous. But if we talk about materials, it's clear the infiniti just has it better. I'm not saying the Stinger material sucks. The stinger material is actually good but I'm just saying the Infiniti material is better. But somehow this gets your panties twisted. Lol.

I never said it is junk, I said it is ugly. Just look at the pictures man.. Even though design is a subjective thing, that front dash is...
Ok I will not add more oil to the fire. Let's say it is just my opinion (and the opinion of a bunch of people who -by coincidence- seem to share the same taste in interior design).
You have a tendency to over react. There are so much feelings in your posts. On the other side, I am completely relax and while you write your next foot-long answer full of hatred, I will be petting my dog and giving water to my living room plants.

 

[Kamauxx]

Ok I will not add more oil to the fire.

Yes, please! Just let him have this. He's clearly very passionate about Infiniti and comparing his replies to everyone else's it's obvious he cares more about this than the rest of us. He needs to win his "debate" more than any of us could possibly fathom. Let him "win" and everyone can move on.

 

[Ucinn]

Surprise surprise - you just lied. You claim the Q50 doesn't show up. It does. The Infiniti Q60 (which carries a similar interior in as the Q50 RS in the 2018 model) shows up on this website. What doesn't show up is the KIA Stinger.

Confusing, He lied that the Q50 didn't show up, but the Q60 did and they are similar (not exact) so he really didn't lie if the Q60 showed up and not the Q50...semantics I guess

I have to agree that the Q50 interior is fugly to me. It may be squishier, but who wants to squeeze that? This is all personal opinion, so no one is ever going to be "right" here.

 

[DaJackson]

Does someone want to make a post that moves this post in a different direction or do we want to continue the debate on who can google better?

 

[Doel]

According to MotorTrend, the KIA Stinger GT did 60 in 4.8 Seconds and quarter mile to 13.3 seconds at 106.9 MPH.
"Korean-branded cars usually aren't synonymous with performance, but the rear-drive Stinger GT launches from 0 to 60 mph in 4.8 seconds and clocks the standing quarter mile in 13.3 seconds at 106.9 mph."


Like you said - the Infiniti Q50 RS did it 0-60 in 4.5 seconds and the quarter mile at 13 second and 109 MPH.


For the Car and Driver times: You have the Q50 RS reaching 60 at 4.5 with the Stinger GT reaching it at 4.4. Similarity - the 1/4 for the Q50 RS is 13 flat with the Stinger GT at 12.9.

The .1 second difference could be the car or driver input.

Define the time show you want to but please next time, use the same source for the same car.

DISCLAIMER: I can't post links because I'm a new member. So google them

Weather conditions will change 1/4 mile times far more than .1 second, if they used different tracks the difference could be even more. From all the videos I've seen where the two cars race each other, the Q50RS is faster.

 

[Johnni]

Why are we still debate with MTM S4 who does not own the car he debating about. Let face the facts that everyone see beauty in their own eye and not all people will agree with each other. However with that say, our opinions on the Stinger will differ from MTM S4 and debating with him its like saying I like BLUE and he say he like RED.

 

[Jayce]

I think the majority of people would probably prefer the Stinger to the Q50 RS. Jalopnik just posted a review of the Red Sport today. It talks about how the interior is dated. I agree. I also don't have a dog in this fight cause I own neither, and it's likely I won't end up with either. I considered the Red Sport and it was too dated for me. I also considered the Stinger, but so far its missing too many options for me. Funny thing is, first comment posted during the article when I read it was why would anyone buy a Q50 over a Stinger lol. Just let this guy continue to spout his opinion. He's not gonna change his mind and neither are we. Hopefully the thread will die then.


https://jalopnik.com/the-400-hp-2018-infiniti-q50-red-sport-awd-is-so-close-1828372623