Now I REALLY can't wait for the test drive.....I've driven the 2.0 and all I gotta say is this 2.5 is totally different, tons of torque and it just gets up and goes, a lot of fun, no v6 envy here!!

Now I REALLY can't wait for the test drive.....I've driven the 2.0 and all I gotta say is this 2.5 is totally different, tons of torque and it just gets up and goes, a lot of fun, no v6 envy here!!
I am guessing that the 2.5L is only a little different than the 3.3L, not noticeably different in most situations.Now I REALLY can't wait for the test drive.....![]()
Aesthetics are the same, 0-60 is about a second slower than the 3.3.I am guessing that the 2.5L is only a little different than the 3.3L, not noticeably different in most situations.
Yes. Zero to sixty is a definite comparison. But light to light? Pole position, kickdown switch, on most open roads, is going to feel subjective: especially when you don't go from one Stinger to the other, deliberately comparing what you feel.Aesthetics are the same, 0-60 is about a second slower than the 3.3.
Ive had 0 issues passing fast, engine is very responsive and lots of torque.Yes. Zero to sixty is a definite comparison. But light to light? Pole position, kickdown switch, on most open roads, is going to feel subjective: especially when you don't go from one Stinger to the other, deliberately comparing what you feel.
Passing fast is my main reason for having the 3.3L. This comparison (much like a high speed rolling start) is what I would be looking at.
That's what I am thinking: other than full-on, WOT passing (rare enough), there would likely be little to no perceivable difference in the 2.5L and 3.3L when downshifting and pulling out to pass fast.Ive had 0 issues passing fast, engine is very responsive and lots of torque.
That's a good question, I'll have to look into it.That's what I am thinking: other than full-on, WOT passing (rare enough), there would likely be little to no perceivable difference in the 2.5L and 3.3L when downshifting and pulling out to pass fast.
What is the rated (limited) top speed of the 2.5L? I've never read anything stating that (for that matter, I never heard what the purported top speed of the 2.0L is either; or I've spaced off knowing that, heh).
Great responses man......That's what I am thinking: other than full-on, WOT passing (rare enough), there would likely be little to no perceivable difference in the 2.5L and 3.3L when downshifting and pulling out to pass fast.
What is the rated (limited) top speed of the 2.5L? I've never read anything stating that (for that matter, I never heard what the purported top speed of the 2.0L is either; or I've spaced off knowing that, heh).
Coincidentally, I just asked the new "German" member what his 2.0L top speed is, because he said the limiter must go.Top speed for the 2.0 is 133.