LAP3 Pro Tuner Review

[ZyroXZ2]

They typically have a folder for every single car they run. They should have all run files for all of them. If you remember the date of your dyno run, they can easily find them.

Oh I know there's a file, I just don't know if they actually kept it. They could have well deleted it afterwards... these guys didn't even point fans at my intercooler, so they really didn't take me very seriously until all of a sudden they're seeing 440WHP pulls and the entire shop suddenly wants to talk... *shrug* There's another 5WHP because my car was run on static air (no fans pointing at the front of the car, you can actually see them in the lower left of the video)

So does this mean LAP3 is going to give me more power?

 

[Oryan]

One thing I do like about Lap3 is the smoother and (relatively) lower torque peak down low. 500+ ft/lbs at 2500 rpm is a good number to say and is nice on a roll but a RWD car on street tires isn't putting that down from a dig without either lighting up tires or going a little sideways. A curve like that is a lot easier to launch with.

 

[LAP3 Performance]

One thing I do like about Lap3 is the smoother and (relatively) lower torque peak down low. 500+ ft/lbs at 2500 rpm is a good number to say and is nice on a roll but a RWD car on street tires isn't putting that down from a dig without either lighting up tires or going a little sideways. A curve like that is a lot easier to launch with.

The torque numbers depend on the dyno facility and how well it's calibrated. Certain companies/vendors on this forum use dynojet facilities that show ridiculously high torque values, although the HP numbers are relative to other dynojet. Our dyno doesn't inflate torque numbers.

I often see certain individuals love using those high reading torque values to talk down on our products. Here's an example for those who claims our Pro-Tuner makes 50-60ft-lbs less than others. I have mentioned it many times, but people being biased to competitors' chips don't like to play fair when comparing our products to theirs. It will put down over 500ft-lbs on a stock vehicle+intake+pro-tuner if the Pro-Tuner users dyno their vehicles at the dyno facility that reads as such. See the post from our facebook group.



Like @DaBears4Lyfe said, one of the key differences is that the Pro-Tuner mapping does provide linear & smooth power delivery compare to any PNP tuning solutions on the market.

 

[ZyroXZ2]

@LAP3 Tuning They haven't replied to me, yet. Not getting the best feeling about getting you those files.

On the flipside, will you be offering an ECU/TCU tune that works with the LAP3 Pro Tuner? As in, instead of paying through the nose to just to get better launches/potential burnouts through better throttle limits, etc., LAP3 Pro Tuner users get a reduced cost swap that enhances the things the LAP3 Pro Tuner can't?

Yes, please?

 

[G-862916]

I could beleive he's making 430+ wHP. That would translate to over 500 at the crank.

A stock Stinger on a dyno will make around 415 whp -420 whp so with the tune you will get between 70 whp to 110 whp depending of the mods you have on a car ...

 

[Kamauxx]

A stock Stinger on a dyno will make around 415 whp -420 whp so with the tune you will get between 70 whp to 110 whp depending of the mods you have on a car ...

That sentence just destroyed my mind.

 

[xot1]

A stock Stinger on a dyno will make around 415 whp -420 whp so with the tune you will get between 70 whp to 110 whp depending of the mods you have on a car ...

I don't know where you picked up such an incorrect info but that is completely wrong. A stock stinger makes about 290~300whp (AWD) or 320~330whp (RWD).

 

[ecko04]

This is ridiculous. Deactivate guest accounts.