Drag/Acceleration Kia Stinger 1/4 Mile Times

[Kato_the_kia_stinger]

Are there still no other 2.0 1/4 times yet?

I wish more people would post times, especially for the 2.0! I saw you in action, Bryan, and the thing is swift.

 

[Kato_the_kia_stinger]

 

[Bryan3.3]

I wish more people would post times, especially for the 2.0! I saw you in action, Bryan, and the thing is swift.

Some comparison would be nice.

 

[Tonkabob]

View attachment 13097 New best for me tonight. Ran 1/4 at Atco. 12.46. JB4. Map2. 93 Octane. Cool night, but 93% humidity. Videos to follow.

Wow, very nice. Almost matched my 12.44. If you hit my one time oddly fast 1.91 launch you would be in the 12.3s. Making good power.
What are your mods again beyond the jb4?

 

[Terry@BMS]

Nice!

 

[washguy]

View attachment 13097 New best for me tonight. Ran 1/4 at Atco. 12.46. JB4. Map2. 93 Octane. Cool night, but 93% humidity. Videos to follow.

BallsAwesome CONGRATS ! nothing like cool air....but you did this on map2....way to go...I wanna see map3 or 5 slips....lol good going ....Wash

 

[Kato_the_kia_stinger]

Wow, very nice. Almost matched my 12.44. If you hit my one time oddly fast 1.91 launch you would be in the 12.3s. Making good power.
What are your mods again beyond the jb4?

K&N Intake. This was Map2 with 93 octane. How about you?

 

[StungBlueGT2]

Some comparison would be nice.

I agree but don’t think we’ll see many 2.0s posted. Most people got the 3.3TT if they wanted the Stinger for performance and cared about 1/4m, but thanks for still being an enthusiast. Appreciate you sharing and keep those runs coming.

 

[Tonkabob]

K&N Intake. This was Map2 with 93 octane. How about you?

I ran the 12.44 with tork tune, catback and stock airbox with k&n panels.
Just added JT intakes and FMIC. 0-60 dropped by .2 but not sure that will hold up on my 1/4 mile time.

 

[KLR STINGER]

Good old ATCO. Great times man. I'm going to try and reclaim my AWD record in a couple weeks with the cooler weather

 

[Kato_the_kia_stinger]

I ran the 12.44 with tork tune, catback and stock airbox with k&n panels.
Just added JT intakes and FMIC. 0-60 dropped by .2 but not sure that will hold up on my 1/4 mile time.

Map? Octane? AWD or RWD?

 

[Tonkabob]

Map? Octane? AWD or RWD?

AWD. ecu tune so just my daily driver 92 octane map.
Track is 350 feet elevation.

 

[Tonkabob]

Good old ATCO. Great times man. I'm going to try and reclaim my AWD record in a couple weeks with the cooler weather

I'm calling no dragy for the record since the last dragy poster was off by .02 and .05. I' m going to try to improve on the AWD record on 10-13 if no rain.

 

[Bryan3.3]

I agree but don’t think we’ll see many 2.0s posted. Most people got the 3.3TT if they wanted the Stinger for performance and cared about 1/4m, but thanks for still being an enthusiast. Appreciate you sharing and keep those runs coming.

The weather is getting better. I’ll
Probably be going to the track this coming week. I’m curious to see if m

I'm calling no dragy for the record since the last dragy poster was off by .02 and .05. I' m going to try to improve on the AWD record on 10-13 if no rain.

Where at?

 

[KLR STINGER]

I'm going to track.

 

[Kamauxx]

I'm calling no dragy for the record since the last dragy poster was off by .02 and .05. I' m going to try to improve on the AWD record on 10-13 if no rain.

But aren't the Dragys consistently showing slightly slower times?

 

[SteveCo]

'Off' by 2 to 5 hundredths of a second is unreal - being able to reach that kind of timing resolution with that little box, onboard a moving vehicle, is astounding. One of the better tools I've purchased in a long time!

 

[StungBlueGT2]

'Off' by 2 to 5 hundredths of a second is unreal - being able to reach that kind of timing resolution with that little box, onboard a moving vehicle, is astounding. One of the better tools I've purchased in a long time!

Agreed. A hundredth of a second variation is so minuet it can be caused by anything... You’ll have more of a difference between back to back runs at the track, even with same exact conditions.

I’ve heard a tenth of a second is a safe margin of error for most comparisons, which makes anything more accurate basically irrelevant when comparing peoples times. Same premise as why we don’t directly compare different dyno results. Just too many variables to make an accurate comparison of different cars/runs etc...

And if Kamauxx is right then the dragy’s measurements are on the conservative side and in theory their results would be even better at a quality track.

 

[Tonkabob]

The weather is getting better. I’ll
Probably be going to the track this coming week. I’m curious to see if m



Where at?

Pacific raceways, Kent Wa

 

[Tonkabob]

But aren't the Dragys consistently showing slightly slower times?

Yeah so far dragy times slower but we need more examples to know for sure. KLR stinger is going to the track so he should beat his dragy time and have some more track vs dragy comparisons.