When you say "without ducts" do you mean oem setup or simply just removing yours and not putting the oem contraption back on?
I just took mine off, I really don't get how the OEM intake can possibly help in any way, it looks like it would suck in hot air from that empty space between fascia and front of car. I'd probably get larger differences if I left that part on.
Definitely interested in a more detailed write-up on this. I love the look of the
snorkels, but I'm concerned about the general effects on cooling when the shroud has been removed. Being that I live in a city, I'm stopped or moving under 60 more often than not.
Not much more detailed to get, behind the front fascia, under the headlights, above the radiator, etc, there's several inches of empty dead space. This is where the oem intakes get their air from... problem is that this dead space is cut off from cooler intake air by the radiator shroud, and vice versa, the radiator is cut off from this dead space by the shroud. This dead space seems more open to the engine bay than to outside, so it likely gets warmer . My theory is that if the car idling and the fan kicks on, without the shroud, the radiator fan would suck in some air from this dead space, which is gonna be hotter than outside air, just because it's in more of an enclosed area with lots of heat soaked surfaces. With the shroud, the radiator only sucks in outside air, likely to be cooler. I should qualify this as being a small difference, and really only takes effect when idling for a while, so that dead space has time to heat up, and even then it wouldn't cause an overheat or anything. Once the car is moving, even under 30, you have enough airflow that it shouldn't be noticeable, as you can see from Rakker's graphs. someone would have to datalog while idling with and then without the shroud to know for sure, and I'm not going to that trouble. To be sure, I think the
snorkels give a better net cooling effect than the shroud, it's not a bad tradeoff, but it's why I tried to make mine salvage the shroud, to keep best of both worlds.
Rakker, your graphs look similar to what I'm seeing, though I'm trying to analyze mine based on the delta between the intake temp and the ambient temp vs speed. This lets me see at what speeds the
snorkels have greater effect, at what point their benefit gets lost in the excess airflow, etc. I take the logs of speed, intake temp and ambient temp, sort and split the data into 10MPH "chunks" then plot all the delta temps in that range, finding averages. This helps rule out outliers due to starting and stopping,and the constantly spiking and diving temps.
I still need to log more data to tighten up my deviation, but I'm basically seeing roughly 4-5 deg cooler intake temps in the 20-50 Mph ranges, decreasing to only about 1 degree cooler above 60. It'd be great to get logs from someone with the OEM intakes to see if that makes a bigger difference.