So the NZ response letter just muddies the water on this issue. Per the members here KMA (Kia Motors America) is offering a "full," respray which we now know is not a full respray rather it is limited to the exterior metal panels. Which is pretty frustrating, how expensive would it be to put a new GT bumper, prep, prime, and paint to ensure the paint matches. That isn't even addressing blending the bumpers to the body panels that will be resprayed. Im very concerned that the respray will never be fully right.
A buy back or a swap to another Stinger have also been stated. Buyback certainly seems like a better option at this point.
I think we need to establish that some facts are becoming apparent. Per the build date poll, cars built in October, November and December are the most at risk. I thought I read that the Kia affirmed it is a paint adhesion issue; i.e. primer. When I see images of the Yellow cars with chipping, the primer looks the same as the Blue cars with chipping, as the Black cars with chipping. I think there may be a correlation here given that the Yellows were likely the first cars produced followed by Blue. I only assume Blue since it has the highest number of owners claiming to have an issue. (This would be the time to build a spreadsheet or create a multi-response poll admins

) The paint process for these cars a GT2 or a 2.0 appear to be the same...
So I think what KMA (Kia Motors America) is missing in this whole ordeal is the impact this situation is having within the Stinger communities.
KMA (Kia Motors America) developed, marketed, targeted, and sold the Stinger to performance minded buyers. The Stinger has a small market share, as of May I think the total number of units sold was less than 6,000. Every single owner of the Stinger is a brand ambassador for KMA (Kia Motors America).
Every single member on this board is an important marketing tool, a tool of brand awareness, and ambassador for KMA (Kia Motors America). KIA has struggled for years to shake the reputation it gained when it first entered the US market. Look at Facebook and Forums where the Stinger v Mustang or Stinger v 2017 Commodore reviews are posted. The majority of the owners post about Kia's being crap cars, Kia being cars that cannot perform, Kia being a junk brand thats a poser. I think we all know how far from the truth that is, but when an owner is saddled with a 50k car and paint is performing worse than a rental Corolla we have a problem!! Currently in a rental Corolla with 32,000 miles and the paint is holding up better than your Stingers. Just to clarify ceramic coating is not the freaking answer when the paint isnt sticking to the dang primer. I've seen this posted here since February; yeah I've been lurking for a hot minute and Im glad I didnt jump on a lease now.
Its my hypothesis that the primer used on the yellow cars, is the same that was used for the early production cars. Kia needs to own this issue if they want to see the Stinger be successful within the performance minded buyers. This issue isnt going to affect just the Stinger, I think you will see apprehension toward the
G70 as well. Kia needs to step up and offer a true respray, buy backs, or swap and compensation to the owners.
If they drop ball, maybe Tom McPharlan of Jalopnik fame can help lead a class action suit, he seems to like that kind of work

))))