I wonder how true this is. It seems to me that a brand with higher expectations creates disappointment proportional to those expectations. Kia's Stinger assault is in full swing, with gobs of increasing positive reviews; none of them mention paint that I have heard of. The paint is arguably the Stinger's biggest flaw. And if anyone is going to choose something else to take the place of paint as a biggest flaw, I'd be interested to know what "less important" thing that would be. In fact, the car is tremendously good at what it was designed to do: go very fast in complete comfort and even luxury; and turn heads while doing it. Paint can be addressed easily. Mechanical or technological flaws/failings, not so much. And, for a first year model, I've heard practically nothing on the level of "catastrophic engine failures" or similar disastrous failures in the Stinger. With the exception of once-off occurrences involving the LSD (Limited Slip Differential) and a transmission fubar (heard of both on this forum quite a while ago), there hasn't been anything to approach such a level of failure. The paint is regrettable but nowhere near a deal breaker. And the rest of the car is solid with very few individual vehicles exhibiting less than stellar performance.