I do not. "Excessive speeding" is anything more than ten above, just about everywhere. In other words, worthless. So, going over ten above is "excessive" to the law, a nanny law. I don't advocate for no speed limits. I want open highways where going FAST is expected and designed into the driving there. Everywhere else you should get slammed for breaking the speed limit. But we don't get options. It's just "speeding" everywhere. There is no venue for enjoying speed in a responsible manner.
And yes, that Stinger cruiser is going to go after anyone doing eleven over, because that's what brings in the revenue. Pure bully pucky.
I do have to scale back my initial remarks, which were partially spoken in jest to get a reaction. The Stinger will be a good cop car. But I don't like MY car "tricked out" that way. It's ugly as sin.
Sorry mate wrong again. Most Highway Patrol won’t even look at you for going 10 over on a freeway here, at least not in my state. At 15 they’ll start to pay attention, at 20 and above, here’s your ticket, slow down, have a nice day. General rule only, not set in concrete as it’s up to the discretion of the officer. Residential streets and built up areas is a different story. So that Stinger (which isn’t my state) won’t ping you for 11 over. Highway patrol isn’t revenue raising its accident prevention and promoting free flow of traffic. Fixed speed cameras are revenue raising and we have plenty of those as well.
Whilst I agree the speed limit could be increased on certain roads, there’s a lot of people who struggle to drive at the current speeds without having accidents, seems changing lanes or driving in a straight line is a problem for some, and don’t even start me on people who can’t manage to drive in the wet. There wouldn’t be a single day that goes by where there’s no crash of some sort on the motorway in my area and it’s 3 lanes wide divided road for the most part. So the limits are there to cater to the lowest common denominator.
As for no venue to enjoy speed in a responsible manner, it’s called a racetrack.
We don’t have purpose built police cars here like you do in the US so nobody cares that the same model car they bought is being used by the police as it’s normal here.
The only time we did build a purpose built police vehicle in Australia we exported it to the US as the Chevy PPV. None were sold in Australia as Holden would only agree to make them for the Australian market if every police force in the country agreed to buy it, which they didn’t as they all have slightly different standards for vehicles, oh and our various State Governments are too tight arsed to spend any money to give the police the resources they need. So our cops are stuck with bog standard family cars that anybody can buy at their local dealership. Which is what makes the Stinger a good choice for them given it’s performance, plus it’s about the only thing left that’s RWD. Other than the Stinger Highway Patrol are using BMW530D, Chrysler 300SRT to replace what’s left of their Australian built Holden Commodores and Ford Falcons, as for the rest of the Police fleet they are stuck with Toyota Camry, Hyundai Sonata, Hyundai Santa Fe, & Kia Sorrento, non of which are suited to being a police vehicle. It’s a shame Ford won’t look at shipping a RHD version of their purpose built police vehicles to Australia.
Anyway I’m sure you’ll disagree with me again MerlintheMad but this thread was about Australian cops replacing their existing fleet with Stingers not the for and against of speed limits and policing them.