Ohiocruiser
1000 Posts Club!
- Joined
- Sep 10, 2020
- Messages
- 1,877
- Reaction score
- 1,394
- Points
- 118
YesWill the factory GT 18"s fit the GT2 AWD?
YesWill the factory GT 18"s fit the GT2 AWD?
Thanks.
Yes. All the Stinger trim wheels are interchangeable. Stock square 18s have a 34 offset.Will the factory GT 18"s fit the GT2 AWD?
Would the 20 offset fit aswell?Confirmed to fit:
Euro Design Tech Matte Gun Metal
18x8/5x114.3
Center Bore: 72.6
Offset: 35
RPF1 18x8.5 ET40. The wheel by itself would mount on front and rear without hitting any suspension parts. The tire, however, will not. Some might clear the strut with 5mm spacers. Others might need up to 10mm to clear.I know some guys can stick the 18in RPF1s on the stinger but I never asked for their specs
Noted. I'll keep that in mind and see if there's a more aggressive offset as well. I want to minimize any use of spacers if possible, and I still want the staggered setup. Tires are cheaper in 18s as well so more flat footing for meRPF1 18x8.5 ET40. The wheel by itself would mount on front and rear without hitting any suspension parts. The tire, however, will not. Some might clear the strut with 5mm spacers. Others might need up to 10mm to clear.
View attachment 86744
I would imagine so since rim/tire would probably rub or hit the strut tower? I'm sticking with 18x8.5Just FYI, RPF1 18x9 ET35 will NOT fit on the front. Learned that the hard way.
I would imagine so since rim/tire would probably rub or hit the strut tower? I'm sticking with 18x8.5
Oh shoot. Dang it guess i will have to find someone with a set to see if with the ET36 offset it will clear the brakes then. I would imagine so since the 57NR has a slight concavity so hopefully that falls in my favor.The spokes wouldn't clear the calipers. Even with 2/5mm spacers.
Is it safe to assume Rays/Gran Lights follow the same ruling. I see their diagram but don't see any text explanation.That's because Enkei makes anything wider that 8.5" in that wheel with an R face, meant for rear wheel applications. So the spokes are more curved.
Konig does the same, except calling their A and B profiles.
![]()
THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN A AND B PROFILE WHEELS - Konig Wheels
How to prevent wheel damagekonigwheels.com
I'm not familiar with those, but if I have to bet money on it, I would say yes. I would check with the mfr or distributor to get word from the horse's mouth.Is it safe to assume Rays/Gran Lights follow the same ruling. I see their diagram but don't see any text explanation.
I did think about Weds TC105X, ET 32 Front and ET 43 rear, again, didn't fully understand what Face 1 meant but it is a lot like Konig's and Rays diagramsI'm not familiar with those, but if I have to bet money on it, I would say yes. I would check with the mfr or distributor to get word from the horse's mouth.
That said... true forged wheels could have enough strength for the spokes to be curved sufficiently for brake caliper clearance, even with wider wheels. That is the main advantage they have over flow-formed wheels, whose front face (hub, spokes) remains basically cast.
They sure are nice, but that last 1 or 2 lbs of weight savings start to cost disproportionately more. Tough to justify in my book.I did think about Weds TC105X, ET 32 Front and ET 43 rear, again, didn't fully understand what Face 1 meant but it is a lot like Konig's and Rays diagrams