Quality of materials

Value doesnt have to mean discounts , high quality ,more features and fair pricing relative to competition is where they are going I think
Yes, but they don't want to be the "Holy crap! You can get the Flux Capacitor and Continuum Transfunctioner in the Rio!" brand anymore. At one point or another their top car is going to get the best features first, and then the rest of the models will follow suit. Not the Optima having the same machine gun turret as the K900...
 
Yes, but they don't want to be the "Holy crap! You can get the Flux Capacitor and Continuum Transfunctioner in the Rio!" brand anymore. At one point or another their top car is going to get the best features first, and then the rest of the models will follow suit. Not the Optima having the same machine gun turret as the K900...
Thats what I meant by "relative to the competiton" , certainly higher tiers would require more "stuff" , lower , less but competitive to their set of like competitors . A key strategic issue I see looming is whether they see more upside in rolling out their E brand or something meaningful to allow consumers to embrace a higher tier without the Kia bagage . From the feedback I read here it seems like many existing Kia customers are relatively happy trading up to a Stinger with Kia branding while several 'New" customers opt to rebrand ..................
 
Thats what I meant by "relative to the competiton" , certainly higher tiers would require more "stuff" , lower , less but competitive to their set of like competitors . A key strategic issue I see looming is whether they see more upside in rolling out their E brand or something meaningful to allow consumers to embrace a higher tier without the Kia bagage . From the feedback I read here it seems like many existing Kia customers are relatively happy trading up to a Stinger with Kia branding while several 'New" customers opt to rebrand ..................
I don't think Kia is going to start a sub brand. I really don't. I think Kia is going to try Hyundai's "Plan B" which was just "be Hyundai" - but a better Hyundai. If Kia is going to have products as good as Audi or BMW, they're eventually going to get recognized for it without having to create and spend money on a separate brand. This would allow them to sell competitive products priced lower in return for average service. If Kia's service ever improves to the point where they can raise prices to the same point as Audi and BMW, then they'll have achieved what no other mainstream brand has. It's possible - but it'll take generations...
 
______________________________
It would be good to see them do that but the way consumers minds work, it will not be easy. VW tried that with the Phaeton, it was a great car but most folks saw it as an over priced VW and not a luxury car within the VW line. When folks think luxury, they want the whole experience to be special. Volvo was not really thought of as a true luxury brand in the US, they were always behind the others, now they have come out with some great designs and are marketing their vehicles at higher prices with items folks want in a luxury vehicle, well except maybe the al 4 cylinder line up however, after you drive that super-turbo charged 4 banger and see it does the work it fine. They may not be the tops but the beautiful design and quality material is pulling in a folks that would normally not consider them.

What surprised me with the Stinger is they introduced it first here and said they were targeting the Germans, other than performance, we should get it loaded up like you an get with the top level Optima on the 2.0T premium and mid-level GT should have top level Cadenza trim with the GT2 taking it up a notch more. I get that the engine and suspension tuning are a big part of that price but the looks and performance specs shocked everyone at the introduction, the equipment offered should also provide that level of surprise.
 
It would be good to see them do that but the way consumers minds work, it will not be easy. VW tried that with the Phaeton, it was a great car but most folks saw it as an over priced VW and not a luxury car within the VW line. When folks think luxury, they want the whole experience to be special. Volvo was not really thought of as a true luxury brand in the US, they were always behind the others, now they have come out with some great designs and are marketing their vehicles at higher prices with items folks want in a luxury vehicle, well except maybe the al 4 cylinder line up however, after you drive that super-turbo charged 4 banger and see it does the work it fine. They may not be the tops but the beautiful design and quality material is pulling in a folks that would normally not consider them.

What surprised me with the Stinger is they introduced it first here and said they were targeting the Germans, other than performance, we should get it loaded up like you an get with the top level Optima on the 2.0T premium and mid-level GT should have top level Cadenza trim with the GT2 taking it up a notch more. I get that the engine and suspension tuning are a big part of that price but the looks and performance specs shocked everyone at the introduction, the equipment offered should also provide that level of surprise.
I think Kia USA is the culprit for the content and pricing issue , not corporate . In Canada our GT Limited is is fully loaded with all the options including 360 camera , rear heated seats etc , and it was MSRP $49,995 ................Personally I think they left $5K or more on the table , regional marketing ( countries ) seems to differ globally in some ways
 
From interior to exterior to high performance - everything you need for your Stinger awaits you...
I don't think Kia is going to start a sub brand. I really don't. I think Kia is going to try Hyundai's "Plan B" which was just "be Hyundai" - but a better Hyundai. If Kia is going to have products as good as Audi or BMW, they're eventually going to get recognized for it without having to create and spend money on a separate brand. This would allow them to sell competitive products priced lower in return for average service. If Kia's service ever improves to the point where they can raise prices to the same point as Audi and BMW, then they'll have achieved what no other mainstream brand has. It's possible - but it'll take generations...
The accountant in me doesnt disagree with the cost logic , the marketer in me sees it in other ways . I agree to a point , WHY then would they do E for their domestic market for the Stinger, they are thinking about this ............Looks like the next premium vehicle ontap is the Telluride , which likely wont launch in Korea , how will they handle that with the learning from Stinger. As for Stinger , the horse is out of the barn now and it would be a disaster to rebrand it away from Kia now BUT this E thing really makes me think they are thinking about another tier , they certainly have not curtailed the selling of E or Stinger badging for ther after market so they clearly arent trying to contain E................just thinkin :thumbdown::thumbdown::thumbdown:
 
It would be good to see them do that but the way consumers minds work, it will not be easy. VW tried that with the Phaeton, it was a great car but most folks saw it as an over priced VW and not a luxury car within the VW line. When folks think luxury, they want the whole experience to be special. Volvo was not really thought of as a true luxury brand in the US, they were always behind the others, now they have come out with some great designs and are marketing their vehicles at higher prices with items folks want in a luxury vehicle, well except maybe the al 4 cylinder line up however, after you drive that super-turbo charged 4 banger and see it does the work it fine. They may not be the tops but the beautiful design and quality material is pulling in a folks that would normally not consider them.

What surprised me with the Stinger is they introduced it first here and said they were targeting the Germans, other than performance, we should get it loaded up like you an get with the top level Optima on the 2.0T premium and mid-level GT should have top level Cadenza trim with the GT2 taking it up a notch more. I get that the engine and suspension tuning are a big part of that price but the looks and performance specs shocked everyone at the introduction, the equipment offered should also provide that level of surprise.

The Phaeton failed because it was too much of a price increase for Volkswagen buyers AND it was too similar to the Audi A8. Hyundai and Kia need to make sure their products are significantly different and not priced sky-high.

The accountant in me doesnt disagree with the cost logic , the marketer in me sees it in other ways . I agree to a point , WHY then would they do E for their domestic market for the Stinger, they are thinking about this ............Looks like the next premium vehicle ontap is the Telluride , which likely wont launch in Korea , how will they handle that with the learning from Stinger. As for Stinger , the horse is out of the barn now and it would be a disaster to rebrand it away from Kia now BUT this E thing really makes me think they are thinking about another tier , they certainly have not curtailed the selling of E or Stinger badging for ther after market so they clearly arent trying to contain E................just thinkin :thumbdown::thumbdown::thumbdown:

I think Kia is going to work "E" the way Buick is working "Avenir"...

Buick-LaCrosse_Avenir-2018-1024-08.jpg
 
The Phaeton failed because it was too much of a price increase for Volkswagen buyers AND it was too similar to the Audi A8. Hyundai and Kia need to make sure their products are significantly different and not priced sky-high.



I think Kia is going to work "E" the way Buick is working "Avenir"...

Buick-LaCrosse_Avenir-2018-1024-08.jpg
You lost me on this ??
 
What? Avenir? Avenir is Buick's high luxury line of vehicles. It's a different badge that goes on their "special" vehicles - like the "E" on the Stinger and maybe a few other cars...
BUT it still has the Buick badge , Somehow Kia decided to drop their branding in Korea for the Stinger ..............I wonder what they plan to do with it , or what they think the market response is vs Kia Stinger for the rest of the world . Theres more to this
avenir.webp
 
______________________________
From interior to exterior to high performance - everything you need for your Stinger awaits you...
BUT it still has the Buick badge , Somehow Kia decided to drop their branding in Korea for the Stinger ..............I wonder what they plan to do with it , or what they think the market response is vs Kia Stinger for the rest of the world . Theres more to this
View attachment 2033
That's true, not like the Riviera...
 
I don't mind the lower parts being hard myself .... even my 1 Series BMW has fairly hard lower parts, even the entire lower part of the middle console etc.

But one thing you mention irritates me: The streering wheel center is really odd with it's hard palstic round shape. I geuss that's a candidate for aftermarket work :)
There is a good joke in your first line but I can’t comment :rofl: but I agree unfortunately most cars use the same consistency for the lower door panels, unless your buying a rolls Royce!
 
Lol ... I haven't even realized what I said there ...
 
What? Avenir? Avenir is Buick's high luxury line of vehicles. It's a different badge that goes on their "special" vehicles - like the "E" on the Stinger and maybe a few other cars...
Lol...it's just a badge on the same vehicle in a special color. It's still a Buick. It's kinda the same problem with the Stinger.....it's still a KIA!
 
From interior to exterior to high performance - everything you need for your Stinger awaits you...
Lol...it's just a badge on the same vehicle in a special color. It's still a Buick. It's kinda the same problem with the Stinger.....it's still a KIA!
Yes, it just indicates that the car has a higher level of luxury. Back when the Buick Riviera was still roaming the streets - there were no Buick badges. Only a scriptish looking "R"...
 
______________________________
There is a good joke in your first line but I can’t comment :rofl: but I agree unfortunately most cars use the same consistency for the lower door panels, unless your buying a rolls Royce!
Lol I noticed this as well.
 
WHY then would they do E for their domestic market for the Stinger

Peculiar to Asian/Korean cultural symbolism I would say. In NZ, we have a huge fleet of second-hand Japanese imports which often come with their home market model names, which to western mindsets can seem quite strange (and no doubt they think the same of some of ours). I've often wondered how they conjured up the name 'Stinger'. Is it a boxing euphemism or what?
 
Peculiar to Asian/Korean cultural symbolism I would say. In NZ, we have a huge fleet of second-hand Japanese imports which often come with their home market model names, which to western mindsets can seem quite strange (and no doubt they think the same of some of ours). I've often wondered how they conjured up the name 'Stinger'. Is it a boxing euphemism or what?
My question isnt the model , Stinger is their model name globally , lots opinions on why / what / how . But generally I think people are finding it a refreshing departure from alpha numeric branding (G70 etc ) ..................
 
From interior to exterior to high performance - everything you need for your Stinger awaits you...
Back
Top