Not as quick as stock

[Double D]

So I installed the JB4, replaced the plugs and I’ve been running it awhile now. I’ve only recently been able try launch control O-60 runs and the quickest I’ve managed is 4.7. That’s map 2 on 93 octane with octane boost additive. No other engine mods on the car.

 

[Terry@BMS]

Post a log if you want tuning help. What was your best 0-60 stock? Traction is key so you may need to limit boost in lower gears.

 

[Kamauxx]

So I installed the JB4, replaced the plugs and I’ve been running it awhile now. I’ve only recently been able try launch control O-60 runs and the quickest I’ve managed is 4.7. That’s map 2 on 93 octane with octane boost additive. No other engine mods on the car.

Set it to map 0 and compare that with your map 2 time. Your stock car probably isn't as fast as stock Kia advertised time.

 

[Revvdmedia]

I'll do you one better, 5.1s 0-60 with map 2 and AWD. Ask me how I feel about it.

 

[Double D]

Post a log if you want tuning help. What was your best 0-60 stock? Traction is key so you may need to limit boost in lower gears.

I’m not losing traction. It seems slow spooling up. AWD, no wheel spin at all

Not to ask a dumb question but I’m good at it, do I post the preview log or the graph?

 

[Kamauxx]

I don't think Kia advertised atock AWD Stingers to go 0-60 in 4.7. That's their RWD time (and probably a bare bones no options GT).

Stock RWD is faster than stock AWD.(modded is a different story, of course)

Best way to tell what difference your JB4 made is to compare a map 0 run to a map 2 run.

 

[washguy]

So I installed the JB4, replaced the plugs and I’ve been running it awhile now. I’ve only recently been able try launch control O-60 runs and the quickest I’ve managed is 4.7. That’s map 2 on 93 octane with octane boost additive. No other engine mods on the car.

Double D post up your dragy slip of that run....what was the DA and temp? Why don't ya put it on map 3 and give it a try.....with a DIY intake and map 3 im getting 4.6 's now that its 87 degrees and almost 3000 DA .......Wash

 

[Double D]

Double D post up your dragy slip of that run....what was the DA and temp? Why don't ya put it on map 3 and give it a try.....with a DIY intake and map 3 im getting 4.6 's now that its 87 degrees and almost 3000 DA .......Wash

 

[Double D]

Terry@bms

 

[Kamauxx]

If you're interested in how other modded Stingers perform in the 0-60 realm here's a list of the top 15 quickest on the forum.

Seems your car is doing about what it should be with minimal modding.




1. 3.65 seconds, 177.35 feet, -.92% slope @Tonkabob,
GT2 AWD, Tork ECU tune, Ark catback, JT intake, Ultimate FMIC, SSR Midpipe, 23 lb wheels. E15 94 octane

2. 3.79 seconds, 188.58 feet, -.87 slope @ScottyCole
AWD, Lap3 Pro, K&N Intakes, UP HFC down/mid, Borla Catback, 93 octane

3. 3.94 seconds, 194.68 feet, +.40% slope @Get Stung
AWD, JB4 Map3, Secondary CAT bypass, Borla catback, 93 octane

4. 4.04 seconds, 201.83 feet, -.49% slope @KLR STINGER
AWD, JB4 map2, Intakes, Velossa snorkels, Magnaflow Catback, JT FMIC, Lap3 primary dp, JunBl Mid (no cats), Magnaflow Catback

5. 4.06 seconds, 193.21 feet, -.17 slope, @Terry@BMS
GT RWD, JB4, BMS intake, Water/Methanol injection 50/50, Drag radials, wheels.

6. 4.08 seconds, 194.66 feet, 0% slope, @STINGER
RWD, JB4 map 3, WMI, VT Snorkel, K&N Drop ins, NGT primary, JunBL mid (no cats) EVC cat back

7. 4.16 seconds, 206.39 feet, -.16 slope @Stormlasher
AWD, Lap3 Pro, intakes, UP primary and secondary, catback

8. 4.18 seconds, 205.29 feet, +.64% slope, @Blitz
AWD, 92 Octane, JB4 Map2, Agency Power Intakes, SSR DP

9. 4.19 seconds, 201.95 feet, -.49% slope. @Adamdan
AWD jb4 map 3, jun mid pipes-evc catback, k&n panel filters, 91 octane with some E85.

10. 4.20* seconds (*escort G force, unknown distance and slope) @eflyguy
AWD, Presseretech ECU tune, 93 octane

11. 4.27 seconds, 212.10 feet, -.46% slope @HARRY
AWD, JB4 map3, borla catback, NGM intake

12. 4.29 seconds, 204.35 feet, +.16% @Whiteybird
RWD, JB4, WMI, SSR mids, JT CAI, DRs

13. 4.31 seconds, 203.13 feet. 0% slope @ryan1stinger
RWD, RaceChip, and Tork Intake

14. 4.40 seconds, 211.80, -.93% @Matt77
RWD, catback, secondary dp

15. 4.48 seconds, 215.45 feet, +.46 slope, @ D-C
RWD JB4 map 5, Ark cat back, 30% E85



And some times from an older list.


4.63 Seconds, 216ft, +.615 slope, @DaBears4Lyfe
Intake, dump valves

4.64 seconds, 223.29 feet, +.29 slope, @washguy"Wash"
RWD, JB4, K&N Drop ins

4.83 seconds, 237.52 feet, +.83 slope, @Ahawk
Stock

4.91 seconds, 73.01 M (239.53 feet), +2.19 slope, @Danel Egan
RWD stock

4.96 seconds 247.63 feet, -.4 slope, @friss
GT2 AWD, Big mouth, K&N drop in

 

[Terry@BMS]

Terry@bms

Log looks fine to me but it's a rolling start?

 

[washguy]

Double D heres a dragy of map3 93 gas Lil e85..stock.. but back in spring when it was cooler....Wash

 

[washguy]

DD what are you trying to accomplish? If you want Terry to look at your 0 to 60 logs...and that's what you are asking about...you have to start from a dead stop and then matt the gas pedal.....geez on the cvs file you posted all your doing is cruising.....push the right pedal to the floor.....like till it wont go any further...and from a dead stop...lol.......... Wash

your csv file looks like mine when im going down my alley

 

[Double D]

DD what are you trying to accomplish? If you want Terry to look at your 0 to 60 logs...and that's what you are asking about...you have to start from a dead stop and then matt the gas pedal.....geez on the cvs file you posted all your doing is cruising.....push the right pedal to the floor.....like till it wont go any further...and from a dead stop...lol.......... Wash

your csv file looks like mine when im going down my alley

I’ve got so many I didn’t know which was which. I didn’t log the 0-60 run

 

[Double D]

Terry@BMS Perhaps this is better. Not a launch control run and not terribly long

 

[Terry@BMS]

Octane looks good, you can give map3 a whirl also! Although if traction is holding you back then lower boost in 1st gear to help with that. For 0-60 it's all about traction.

 

[Double D]

Octane looks good, you can give map3 a whirl also! Although if traction is holding you back then lower boost in 1st gear to help with that. For 0-60 it's all about traction.

I’m grateful for the feedback, thank you!

 

[MerlintheMad]

1. 3.65 seconds, 177.35 feet, -.92% slope @Tonkabob,
GT2 AWD, Tork ECU tune, Ark catback, JT intake, Ultimate FMIC, SSR Midpipe, 23 lb wheels. E15 94 octane

2. 3.79 seconds, 188.58 feet, -.87 slope @ScottyCole
AWD, Lap3 Pro, K&N Intakes, UP HFC down/mid, Borla Catback, 93 octane

3. 3.94 seconds, 194.68 feet, +.40% slope @Get Stung
AWD, JB4 Map3, Secondary CAT bypass, Borla catback, 93 octane

4. 4.04 seconds, 201.83 feet, -.49% slope @KLR STINGER
AWD, JB4 map2, Intakes, Velossa snorkels, Magnaflow Catback, JT FMIC, Lap3 primary dp, JunBl Mid (no cats), Magnaflow Catback

So why are the top four fastest AWD, when everybody who claims to know, says that RWD is the faster off the line?

 

[Kamauxx]

Octane looks good, you can give map3 a whirl also! Although if traction is holding you back then lower boost in 1st gear to help with that. For 0-60 it's all about traction.

He's AWD. Traction shouldn't be an issue, especially if he has the stock MPS4s.

 

[khmer07]

Jb4 Map2, Injen Intake, 93 Octane. No scientific method or anything but just mashing the pedal on the freeway from a stop I get a 4.8- 5.0 0-60 (Without launch control though) It feels like I'm not doing something right. I think I hesitate initially, thinking that a cop is watching me, then I mash the pedal shortly after. Would the 18 inch all seasons affect my time?