Updated dyno numbers

Stiletto

Active Member
Joined
May 8, 2019
Messages
362
Reaction score
267
Points
68
Location
Virginia Beach, VA
Hit the rollers today. Since the last session, I've added the BMS EWG connectors, Jonny Tig merge pipe, GFB Mach 2 BPVs...and Stillen catback. My guess is the latter is the cause for more power, but the EWG wires are probably helping with the smoothing of the power band. Definitely see a jump in torque early on...which is nice on the streets!

Red line is today, blue line is from February 2020. Car made 375/318 with just intakes and 93 octane on this dyno.


550545_585603.jpeg
 
Is this on the factory engine calibration? Or are you running a JB4 or other?
 
From interior to exterior to high performance - everything you need for your Stinger awaits you...
Nice numbers.
 
Here's my Dyno sheet from a few months back basically have the same setup except I have high flow cats, running map 2 with 93 octane, wonder why the torque is so much difference mine is all wheel drive
 

Attachments

  • dynorunShare_0.webp
    dynorunShare_0.webp
    106 KB · Views: 72
Here's my Dyno sheet from a few months back basically have the same setup except I have high flow cats, running map 2 with 93 octane, wonder why the torque is so much difference mine is all wheel drive
High flow cats in the primary downpipes? If so, that's why you could see bigger numbers. That's the largest bottleneck for the exhaust.
 
Yes they are the high-flow cats downpipe combo, that is a before-and-after dino with the high-flow cats
Gotcha. Yeah, dunno why you're reading 40 more wtq. That's the beauty of the dyno...your numbers are your numbers. Without knowing your stock output, it's almost impossible to compare...even if it was the same dynojet I was on.
 
______________________________
From interior to exterior to high performance - everything you need for your Stinger awaits you...
Am I wrong to expect 400 WHP and 500 lb ft on map 2? I'm not super experienced with tunes and such, but with intakes and JB4 map 2, 93 octane I thought this was the norm. Maybe the dyno's on Burger's website have me thinking that?
 
Am I wrong to expect 400 WHP and 500 lb ft on map 2? I'm not super experienced with tunes and such, but with intakes and JB4 map 2, 93 octane I thought this was the norm. Maybe the dyno's on Burger's website have me thinking that?

500 ft lb from tuning and intake (plugs too) would not be normal. Same for 400 whp. But, it's not about who claims the highest number...rather, who can show the largest gains from stock numbers on the EXACT same dyno.
 
damn. gotta find a dyno around here!! see what I'm dealing with. May need to go meth!
 
Kia Stinger
Back
Top