MerlintheMad
10000 Posts Club!
We have plenty. And oil is recyclable.Not maximizing oil life means we are all consuming MORE oil.
If we removed every ounce of petroleum how would that affect the rest of what is in the ground? I don't see a problem. Petroleum that isn't turned into gas fumes is recyclable.That means more petroleum is extracted which creates a greater environmental footprint.
True I suppose. But moot, since we have more than enough petroleum for our perceivable future needs. There is always synthetic. The "premature" dispensing of motor oil does not mean it is wasted, as you point out in your example.Used motor oil doesn't get recycled into new motor oil. It is cleaned and used in other applications such as hydraulic oil, etc. So the new motor oil we're putting in the car is not the recycled oil you dropped prematurely.
I will worry about our environmental footprint when we get rid of MAD. Until then, all such environmental talk is feckless posturing, usually for political agenda reasons (the good movements are co-opted by political movements, usually to beat the West, especially the USA, over the head with). If the nations can cooperate in eradicating the harm we do to the planet, and take measures to fix our mistakes, etc., then surely they can eradicate Nukes. And if they refuse to do that, I do not trust their altruism. As long as MAD is the yardstick of our sanity as a species, I do not hold out any hope for a long future of our species.