Cringed when he drifted through the dirt and rocks. Loved the diverter valve sound!
The fact that the former VP of BMW's M-division had a hand in designing the suspension combined with the apparent fact that it is track-inept doesn't make a ton of sense and is disappointing IMO...maybe the guy was VP of finance. The Chevy SS is roughly the same curb weight (translation: heavy) and has roughly 50 more HP...that alone shouldn't make up for that much discrepancy in lap times....maybe for a track that's 3-4 miles long, but not a track as short as that one. I'm not sure if I represent the minority or majority when I say I was hoping it would be a little more sporty and a little less tour-y, but I guess the market will speak when it's released.So...it's 1.66 seconds slower around the streets of Willow than the V8 Chevrolet SS sedan. I can't wait to see them test the 2018 Regal GS to see if it's weight savings makes up for the naturally aspirated v6....though the Stinger looks better than either of those two.
I think Kia is really looking to sell a lot of these. If they weren't, they'd have made the suspension stiffer. It's made to be a competitive car that'll leave some people in the dust - but also to be comfortable. Even BMW has softened up suspensions these days and the driving enthusiasts aren't a fan of it. However, BMW is selling more cars - and earning more revenue - which in turn will allow them to make better cars in the future...The fact that the former VP of BMW's M-division had a hand in designing the suspension combined with the apparent fact that it is track-inept doesn't make a ton of sense and is disappointing IMO...maybe the guy was VP of finance. The Chevy SS is roughly the same curb weight (translation: heavy) and has roughly 50 more HP...that alone shouldn't make up for that much discrepancy in lap times....maybe for a track that's 3-4 miles long, but not a track as short as that one. I'm not sure if I represent the minority or majority when I say I was hoping it would be a little more sporty and a little less tour-y, but I guess the market will speak when it's released.
I wonder if the car proves to be commercially successful if they would offer a "sport" model or something of the sort with firmer, beefier suspension for a few more bucks for people like me who would gradually sacrifice a bit of comfort for better cornering ability.I think Kia is really looking to sell a lot of these. If they weren't, they'd have made the suspension stiffer. It's made to be a competitive car that'll leave some people in the dust - but also to be comfortable. Even BMW has softened up suspensions these days and the driving enthusiasts aren't a fan of it. However, BMW is selling more cars - and earning more revenue - which in turn will allow them to make better cars in the future...
I really have no doubt this will happen if the car sells enough. I have a strong feeling that version will come with a more powerful tune as well.I wonder if the car proves to be commercially successful if they would offer a "sport" model or something of the sort with firmer, beefier suspension for a few more bucks for people like me who would gradually sacrifice a bit of comfort for better cornering ability.
That would be awesome, unfortunately I'm guessing if they release a "track" version Stinger GT, It would be priced out of my range. Only time will tell!I really have no doubt this will happen if the car sells enough. I have a strong feeling that version will come with a more powerful tune as well.
I bet it would only cost about $2k more or so. Not a crazy amount more for a stiffer suspension and 20 or 30 more horsepower... But that's just a guess. Still, I'm very confident that Kia wants to go all out with a higher performance variant - but first things first...That would be awesome, unfortunately I'm guessing if they release a "track" version Stinger GT, It would be priced out of my range. Only time will tell!
This guy took EVERY opportunity to remind us that the car is a Kia...as if expectations should be lowered because of that. He should stop trying (failing) to be funny and just evaluate the car on its merits.He gave a great review. He really liked it. I think he was trying to be a little silly too much by saying things like "Rocks for a Kia" and correcting himself when he said "Driver's car" with "Driver's Kia". Some people will take that the wrong way - if they don't see he's just being humorous. And when he said he'd like it to be a couple hundred pounds lighter "like a 3-Series" but then said he liked how it had enough back seat room for a tall guy like him - try that in a 3-Series...
Over all a good review and while it's not a track car, it's not intended to be either...
Yes, I agree. I know he likes the car so I'm pretty sure he was being sarcastic about that. But who knows? Most people will assume he was being unkind. But he liked it. Strange. I'm not sure how to read him...This guy took EVERY opportunity to remind us that the car is a Kia...as if expectations should be lowered because of that. He should stop trying (failing) to be funny and just evaluate the car on its merits.
That he is a car snob and even though the car performed really well, he would still never buy it because the badge on the back isn't the right one?!?Yes, I agree. I know he likes the car so I'm pretty sure he was being sarcastic about that. But who knows? Most people will assume he was being unkind. But he liked it. Strange. I'm not sure how to read him...
Could be! I wouldn't be surprised...That he is a car snob and even though the car performed really well, he would still never buy it because the badge on the back isn't the right one?!?
Now there's the silver lining I was looking for!Ever notice how many of the people in these reviews are grinning ear-to-ear while driving this car? That says it all. And I don't get a sarcastic read on the frequent corrections from "car" to "Kia" (OK, I did the first time I watched the video), but rather a feeling that he's trying to emphasize that this is a major departure for Kia.
The fact that the former VP of BMW's M-division had a hand in designing the suspension combined with the apparent fact that it is track-inept doesn't make a ton of sense and is disappointing IMO...maybe the guy was VP of finance. The Chevy SS is roughly the same curb weight (translation: heavy) and has roughly 50 more HP...that alone shouldn't make up for that much discrepancy in lap times....maybe for a track that's 3-4 miles long, but not a track as short as that one. I'm not sure if I represent the minority or majority when I say I was hoping it would be a little more sporty and a little less tour-y, but I guess the market will speak when it's released.