It was the dual inlet catch can from addw1. The two inlet hoses have check valves on each hose as they approach the can. The check valves itself are like 3 inches from the can. Ie can, 3 inches of hose, check valve, then the main hose lines to the engines or intakes or whatever it is. Both check valves were blown out on initial install and a quick run. Addw1 sent three more check valves and all three of those also failed. They are manufacturing more / better valves but they aren't ready yet. In the meantime, they did right and let me send them back the dual inlet can and sent me the normal dual catch can setup (which doesn't have check valves).
I've got a longer post forthcoming which details everything I did as a first time to
mods - what went right, what went wrong, etc.
95% of the problem is gone. I think I can still feel a minor shake on acceleration, but it's basically like normal road vibration. Installer said the
injen setup and the jb4 are gonna cause more total vehicle vibration (incremental and moderate as it may be) than running completely stock. So, it runs well and sounds great at this point and I'm pretty happy now.
Thanks for clearing it up. Not that it matters if any more if you are no longer using the dual-inlet can, but based on the picture that's forming, I'm thinking that kit is not well designed.
Scenario 1: the second check valve was between the breather port on the driver side of the engine and the catch can. This is bad because that port needs to flow in
both directions. A check valve on this side, even when working correctly, would by design block one of those directions, leading to incorrect pressure balance in the crank case.
Scenario 2: the second check valve was between the driver side intake and the catch can, and the breather port was blocked off. In this case, there would be no flow at all through the breather port. When the engine is under boost, the PCV closes, the PCV side check valve closes, crank case pressure builds without a primary means of escape. (Edit: I just saw a picture where the dual inlet can involves a breather filter on the breather port. That is an improvement, but still puzzled on what the second check valve is intended to do.)
I think it's a
good thing that the car didn't run correctly with that setup, regardless of whether the check valves were defective or not. That plumbing and check valve setup was inevitably going to be trouble, so thank goodness you got the warning sign early on. No judgement intended, but ideally your installer would have recognized this too.
The fact that the manufacturer makes one kit with the wrong number of check valves (dual inlet) and another with none, assuming that the internals are the same, leaves me questioning their engineering chops. If the dual inlet can would benefit from using a check valve to keep boost out of the can, the same would apply for the PCV can in a dual can setup. If they don't need check valves at all, it made no sense to include one, much less two.
FYI in case you weren't aware, but you can run a check valve on a can that doesn't come with one, and you can leave it out even if it does. If you do run their dual can kit and decide you want to keep boost out of the PCV can, I would be wary of using any check valve of their design, especially if they suggest installing two valves. To repeat: a check valve has no place on the breather side, and the PCV side does not need more than one, flowing in the correct orientation.
Personally, if the choice was between running a questionable check valve or none at all, I'd go with the latter. Even if it doesn't stick or blow, a poor valve could conceivably leak or restrict flow unintentionally. Too many risks, IMO.
You don't need to take my word for that though, as there's plenty of reading and viewing material out there on this topic.
I do hope it all works out, and it does sound like you're getting back on track.