Never until the Stinger.
Well, welcome to your wakeup call. In the past 20 years, I've owned the following vehicles since new:
2001 Honda Prelude
2011 Volvo XC60 T6
2012 Chevrolet Camaro 2SS/RS
2018 Kia Stinger GT2/AWD
The three preceding cars NEVER had paint issues. At worst, perhaps the Camaro's paint was thin, but it never was at risk for delamination. And rattles? Pfff. The Volvo at 7 years old is still buttoned up and rattle-free, paint is still excellent, and it cost $14-16k LESS than the Stinger.
In addition to my cars, my family has always bought or leased new. Here's a partial list:
1982 Nissan Sentra
1983 Honda Accord
1987 Honda Accord
1987 Acura Legend
1994 Honda Civic
1995 Volvo 850 GLT
1997 Acura 3.2 TL
2000 Acura 3.2 CL Type S
2000 Honda CR-V EX
2004 Acura MDX
2011 Hyundai Tuscon
2014 Acura MDX
2014 Hyundai Santa Fe Sport
I can definitively say that none of these vehicles had the issues you define as "aura of quality," even the ones that are now over 30 years old.
When does a few turn into "more than a few" or "many"? I only see a few owners complaining. Are you asserting that Kia puts more QC into a Rio?! The Stinger is new; the factories, processes, the lot; utterly brand new facilities for a brand new model.
A few, for many people, is something like three or four people. I'm pretty sure we have more than that number of owners with issues.
As to the Rio sure why not, I am saying exactly that. The Rio is a very high volume product compared to the Stinger, and the risk of loss to Kia is that much greater for warranty repairs and recalls that you can bet your rear end that they're QCing the hell out of that car. Limited production runs are not profit winners for manufacturers. They get people in the door to buy less expensive vehicles.
And to your point about things being new, so what? Are you excusing a manufacturer from doing their due diligence not to bring a defective product to market? "Hey, c'mon, they're doing their best." Geez, you'd be a star witness for an anti-consumer protection lobbying firm. Should a product be completely free from defect before it is brought to market? Yes. Yes, it actually should be. Is that reality? No. But the scope and impact of the defect is determinative of whether that defect can be tolerated. Paint defects on a brand new car? Not tolerable. Persistent rattle on one of the defining characteristics of the product? Not tolerable. And while I credit Kia for trying to address these in turn, it is still not acceptable for a brand new car of any kind in 2018.
A troll's true kryptonite. Bye bye Douglas, it's been interesting.
...and just like that you no longer exist in my world. How wonderful technology is.
Lol. I've thought of blocking him but I've never blocked anyone on a forum before. But @MerlintheMad, the reason it's annoying or even upsetting is because you clearly don't, or believe you don't, have issues others are posting about and you let everyone know that. Why gloat? It would be akin to going to thebump.com, talking with hopeful parents, finding a few that had miscarriages, fertility issues or birth defects, and then telling them "well, we got pregnant with no issues and our kids are perfectly fine; new medicine makes childbirth super duper, it's like, only a few of you sinners with problems and your kids are probably fine, you nitpicks."
Do you go to accident posts to announce how free of collision and perfect of driver you are? If not, why post about your car's immaculate quality when the subject of the post concerns a defect? It's troll behavior.