A little 0-60mph action :)

and a waft of truth flows thru the ops post, while fast, worlds apart.
Lol yep... if it isn't verified by Dragy, it didn't happen. Must be nice to have traction :rofl:
 
Lol yep... if it isn't verified by Dragy, it didn't happen. Must be nice to have traction :rofl:

Yeah i was running 4.35s on wet roads. No boost control by gear needed.
 
back to square one launching these cars then. First tuner to figure out how to get these cars under 4 seconds 0-60 on street tires gets my money haha
 
______________________________
Lol yep... if it isn't verified by Dragy, it didn't happen. Must be nice to have traction :rofl:
I jumped my stinger! This really happened because it's on dragy! Check this out. Hit over 1.5gs on freefall.
Screenshot_2018-11-10-07-33-53.webp
;)
:rofl:
 
Last edited:
Here is the first sub 4 second Stinger. Dragy certified valid.
Tork tune, JT intakes, Ultimate Performance FMIC, custom catback with Flowmaster DBX mufflers - GT2 AWD
3.89 0-60 on 11-11-18.webp
 
Last edited:
From interior to exterior to high performance - everything you need for your Stinger awaits you...
Here is the first sub 4 second Stinger. Dragy certified valid.
Tork tune, JT intakes, Ultimate Racing FMIC, custom catback with Flowmaster DBX mufflers - GT2 AWD
View attachment 15045

I seriously doubt that's the first sub 4.0 Stinger. It may be the first documented and posted on a forum, if that's what you're after.

I didn't keep my Dragy long enough to learn what all of the numbers mean. What are the times on the bottom? Older runs?
 
I seriously doubt that's the first sub 4.0 Stinger. It may be the first documented and posted on a forum, if that's what you're after.
If you can't prove it, it doesn't count. So yes the first known sub 4 second Stinger. At least in North America, Australia, Europe. I don't think we get too many non English speakers in our forum or facebook circles.
 
If you can't prove it, it doesn't count. So yes the first known sub 4 second Stinger. At least in North America, Australia, Europe. I don't think we get too many non English speakers in our forum or facebook circles.

Not owning a device to document your 0-60 times doesn't make a car slower. Tork doesn't use a Dragy either, is your 0-60 faster than theirs just because they haven't documented it?

LOL, my hating aside, congratulations on being the fastest Dragy documented, 0-60, AWD Stinger, posted on the Stinger forum.

What are the other numbers on the bottom of the screen shot?
 
Im sorry tonka but something isnt adding up. How did you go from 4.24 on Tuesday to 3.89 today?
 
Last edited:
Im sorry tonka but something isnt adding up. How did you go from 4.24 on Tuesday to 3.89 today?
I got a new tune on Friday.
The numbers on the bottom of of dragy are sub times. On a 0-60 they show time to 10, 20 mph etc. On quarter mile they show 60 foot 330 foot 1/8 th mile.

I also ran a 12.08 1/4 (valid) and two 12.02s that where just barely invalid due to slope. Slope needs to be less than 1% and my 12.02 was 1.09% This run also has a turn which has to slow me down. My 60 foot time is 1.90 and Torks 1.95 and 1/4 mile times essentially the same so pretty sure my 0-60 will be faster until he adds slicks. Already offered to let tork borrow the dragy.

Have Johns slip below. I'm faster to 60 feet and 330 feet and he beats me to 1/8 the by .01 at 94 mph. So yeah, im faster to 60.
But that was a few months ago and an older tune. But on the street no traction for RWDs.
Screenshot_2018-11-11-07-40-29.webp Screenshot_2018-11-11-08-10-51.webp
Screenshot_2018-11-11-14-20-33.webp
 
Last edited:
______________________________
From interior to exterior to high performance - everything you need for your Stinger awaits you...
I see 60ft as 1.9. Not sure where your getting 4 seconds.

In the scree shot of his 0-60 run. At the bottom it has 0-60 4.09s.
 
From interior to exterior to high performance - everything you need for your Stinger awaits you...
Not sure, they usually do match. Here is an up hill 4.03 and the bottom does match. Ill do a few more runs and see if i can get another sub 4 run.
Screenshot_2018-11-12-09-33-22.webp
 
I emailed dragy to see what they say about the odd sub time. But the 3.89 does appear to be valid. My 4.02, 4.03 and 3.89 runs were very consistent up to 50 MPH and the 3.89 dropped time at the very end. Look at the yellow acceleration Gs line and see how little power is lost and how late the shift came for the 3.89 vs the 4.02 run.
3.89 vs 4.02.webp
 
Screenshot_2018-11-17-16-56-59.webp Screenshot_2018-11-17-16-56-35.webp
Here we go 3.87
 
Back
Top