This really needs to be measured in a controlled manner. Butt dynos are not an accurate way of determining if it makes it better or not.
I haven’t tried anything over 93 Octane yet. However, I have compared 93 Octane and 87 Octane, with a bone stock Stinger, with a dragy(extremely precise and accurate device), on the same stretch and they were essentially identical for 0-60 mph and for the 1/8 of a mile. However, that was in cooler temperatures.
It is entirely possible that in warmer temperatures the lower Octane fuel causes the engine to cut back timing.
That being said I highly doubt that the car accounts for higher than 93 Octane in its timing. There wouldn’t be any point in them exceeding their stated performance figures with extremely high Octane fuel. That is what their warranty is based upon and those specifications are based on “91 Octane or greater“ fuel.
I think the car is designed to hit its maximum performance standards in ALL conditions with 91 Octane or higher fuel. It can hit those same standards with 87 Octane or higher in SOME if not most conditions. However, I don’t think putting higher than 91 Octane gas will make a bit of difference in a truly stock Stinger GT.
I definitely would like to see it scientifically tested but I seriously doubt it makes a difference without a modification to the tune.
Here are many different Dragy 0-60 mph runs with 93, 89, and 87 Octane gas. The earliest runs were all with 93 Octane. Then 89 was used. Then 87 was used.
I was able to achieve essentially the same results no matter which fuel I used. However, this was only with cooler temperatures. I fully expect the lower Octane results to degrade as the temperature goes up.
I was able to do 4.95 0-60 mph with 87 Octane and 4.93 0-60 mph with 93 Octane. That is not a significant enough difference to warrant using 93 Octane in cooler weather.

