Thank's for that Greg! I'm in Portland, OR and our politicians are working hard to ensure gas is never under $3 ever again (becaus that'll force us into all-electric cars, right?...) and of course, the highways are nearly identical to 1980, but the state's population is 3x what it was back then, so yah, I feel your gridlock!
NOTE: While Kia's stated mileage ratings differ from the 2.0 and 3.3L versions, I'm seeing an average one mile-per-gallon advantage for the 2.0L version... Hmmm. The 2.0L is trying hard to push a very heavy car, and the turbo might enage more often, chewing up fuel? The GT's 3.3L engine should not need to work as hard considering it's power (but two more cylinders and larger...). Just looks like overall in milage the 2.0L does not see the sticker advantage Kia claims.
I've test driven a 2.0L Premium. It seemed pretty powerful, but that memory is fading. Enough power for you? If so, what was your previous car? Thanks Greg!